Congress fast-tracks land-use rollbacks bundled with spending bill
H.Res. 672 — Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 4553) making appropriations for energy and water development and related agencies for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes; providing for consideration of the joint resolution (H.J. Res. 104) providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Bureau of Land Management relating to ‘‘Miles City Field Office Record of Decision and Approved Resource Management Plan Amendment’’; providing for consideration of the joint resolution (H.J. Res. 105) providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Bureau of Land Management relating to ‘‘North Dakota Field Office Record of Decision and Approved Resource Management Plan’’; providing for consideration of the joint resolution (H.J. Res. 106) providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Bureau of Land Management relating to ‘‘Central Yukon Record of Decision and Approved Resource Management Plan’’; and for other purposes. · Filed by H. Griffith (R-VA) · Introduced Sep 3, 2025 · Passed chamber
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This is a procedural resolution that sets the rules for floor debate and amendment on an energy and water appropriations bill (H.R. 4553) for fiscal 2026, and simultaneously schedules votes on three Congressional Review Act resolutions that would overturn Bureau of Land Management resource management plans for Miles City (Montana), North Dakota, and Central Yukon (Alaska) field offices. The resolution limits amendments to those pre-approved by the Rules Committee and restricts debate time, effectively controlling what changes can be made to the spending bill.
Why we flagged it
HRES 672 is a standard House Rules Committee resolution governing floor procedure, but it bundles three Congressional Review Act disapprovals targeting specific BLM land-management decisions. The procedural wrapper obscures the substantive deregulatory intent of the three CRA resolutions, which may benefit extractive industries while reducing public input on land use.
- Overturns BLM Miles City Field Office resource management plan; substantively unrelated to energy/water appropriations.
- Overturns BLM North Dakota Field Office resource management plan; substantively unrelated to energy/water appropriations.
- Overturns BLM Central Yukon resource management plan; substantively unrelated to energy/water appropriations.
What the text implies
- The three CRA resolutions, if passed, would overturn BLM land-use decisions without requiring the agency to conduct new environmental review or public comment periods—CRA disapprovals are final and cannot be re-issued in substantially the same form.
- Bundling regulatory disapprovals with an appropriations bill may reduce visibility and debate on the land-use consequences, as floor time is constrained and amendments are pre-screened.
- The Miles City, North Dakota, and Central Yukon plans likely govern oil, gas, and mineral leasing; overturning them could accelerate extraction on federal lands in those regions.
- The restricted amendment process (only pre-approved amendments allowed) limits minority and public input on both the appropriations bill and the CRA resolutions.
Who it affects
The procedural framework itself is neutral—all appropriations bills require floor rules. However, the bundling of three BLM disapproval resolutions with an energy/water spending bill may obscure the substantive impact of overturning land-use protections. Citizens in affected regions could face altered environmental management, while the restricted amendment process limits democratic input on the underlying appropriations.
Who stands to gain
- oil and gas companies
- mining companies
- extractive industry contractors
Named in the bill
Bureau of Land Management (BLM), Miles City Field Office (Montana), North Dakota Field Office, Central Yukon Field Office (Alaska), House Committee on Rules, House Committee on Appropriations, House Committee on Natural Resources, Congressional Review Act (Chapter 8, Title 5, USC)
Where it stands
- Sep 3, 2025 — Reported out of committee · Congress.gov: “Placed on the House Calendar, Calendar No. 42”
- Sep 3, 2025 — Passed the House · Congress.gov: “On agreeing to the resolution Agreed to by recorded vote: 212 - 208, 1 Present (Roll no. 222).”
Dates and quoted wording are Congress.gov's action record; the timeline shows status changes, not every procedural step.
How this was measured
Analysis — Quorum's AI read the full bill text on Jul 6, 2026; transparency and hidden-provision scores are compared against the median of 16,222 analysed bills.
Status and sponsors — Congress.gov's bill record — actions, committee referrals and cosponsors — loaded nightly. The timeline shows status changes, not every procedural action.
As of — page rendered 2026-10-20.
“Congress fast-tracks land-use rollbacks bundled with spending bill” QuorumCivic. https://share.quorumcivic.app/bill/119/hres672 Report an error
The week in bills
One email, Sunday: what Congress passed, what it changed, and who paid.
One link arrives to confirm the address. It is used for this email and nothing else, and every issue carries an unsubscribe link.