House fast-tracks repeal of clean-energy tax credits and appliance standards
H.Res. 1075 — Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 4626) to amend the Energy Policy and Conservation Act to prohibit the Secretary of Energy from prescribing any new or amended energy conservation standard for a product that is not technologically feasible and economically justified, and for other purposes, and providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 4758) to repeal provisions of Public Law 117-169 relating to taxpayer subsidies for home electrification, and for other purposes. · Filed by H. Griffith (R-VA) · Introduced Feb 24, 2026 · Passed chamber
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This is a procedural resolution that sets the rules for House floor debate and voting on two energy bills: H.R. 4626, which would block the Department of Energy from setting new appliance efficiency standards unless they are both technologically feasible and economically justified; and H.R. 4758, which would repeal tax credits and subsidies for home electrification enacted in the 2022 Inflation Reduction Act. The resolution waives procedural objections and limits debate to one hour per bill, allowing both to move to a vote.
Why we flagged it
This is a House Rules Committee resolution that establishes debate parameters for two substantive energy bills. Its functional purpose is to expedite floor consideration of deregulatory measures affecting appliance standards and clean-energy subsidies.
What the text implies
- Waiving 'all points of order' against both bills removes procedural safeguards that would normally allow minority objections to be raised on grounds of germaneness, constitutional authority, or budgetary impact.
- The one-hour debate limit per bill (split between majority and minority) severely constrains substantive discussion of complex energy policy affecting millions of households and billions in tax expenditures.
The full analysis lists 5 implications of this text.
Who stands to gain
appliance manufacturers (reduced compliance costs from relaxed efficiency standards); fossil fuel utilities (reduced competition from electrification incentives); natural gas appliance makers (protected from heat pump market share loss)