TSA must publicly report airport security test results annually
H.R. 4126 — ARMS Act · Filed by Eli Crane (R-AZ) · 1 cosponsor · Introduced Jun 25, 2025 · Referred to committee
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill requires the TSA to establish a systematic program of covert security testing at U.S. airports—sneaking prohibited items through checkpoints to identify vulnerabilities—and to publicly report aggregate pass/fail rates annually. The TSA must conduct at least three major testing scenarios per year, including all major airports, analyze any failures within 90 days, decide whether to fix them within 150 days, and retest after fixes are implemented. Congress and the public get annual reports showing overall performance trends, though specific airport data and test methods remain classified.
Why we flagged it
The bill's core mechanism is mandatory covert testing of TSA screening operations with public reporting of aggregate results. It is a transparency and accountability tool, not a deregulation, subsidy, or carve-out.
What the text implies
- Public reporting of aggregate pass/fail rates may create political pressure on TSA leadership and airports, potentially driving resource allocation decisions independent of risk-based prioritization.
- The bill does not specify consequences for repeated failures or timelines for implementing fixes, leaving enforcement discretion entirely with TSA leadership.
The full analysis lists 4 implications of this text.
Who it affects
Citizens gain transparency into TSA screening effectiveness through mandatory public reporting of aggregate pass/fail rates, and the bill creates enforceable timelines for identifying and fixing security gaps. The covert testing regime itself is a standard security-audit tool that does not restrict citizen rights or impose new costs on the public.