QuorumCivic. Hidden in plain sight Get the app
Bill intelligence

Arizona water settlement locks in tribal rights—but forecloses future claims

H.R. 6931 — Yavapai-Apache Nation Water Rights Settlement Act of 2025 · Filed by Eli Crane (R-AZ) · 2 cosponsors · Introduced Dec 26, 2025 · Referred to committee

35%
Transparency
Typical bill: 82%
25/100
Hidden-provision risk
Typical bill: 15/100
High concernIndian Water Rights Settlement &…

Your members of Congress

Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.

Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.

What it does

This bill approves a water rights settlement for the Yavapai-Apache Nation in Arizona, confirming their water rights to the Verde River and Colorado River water, and authorizing construction of two major water infrastructure projects: the Cragin-Verde Pipeline (to deliver water from C.C. Cragin Dam) and a Yavapai-Apache Nation Drinking Water System. The federal government will fund approximately $1.24 billion in construction costs and establish trust funds totaling ~$155.7 million for the Nation to manage water projects, operations, and watershed restoration. In exchange, the Nation waives most historical water rights claims against Arizona, other water users, and the federal government, though it retains rights to enforce the settlement and challenge future water diversions that harm its interests.

Why we flagged it

The bill's core function is to ratify a negotiated water rights settlement between the Yavapai-Apache Nation and the federal government, confirm the Nation's water entitlements, fund major water infrastructure, and establish trust funds for tribal water management. It is a settlement agreement codified into law, not a general appropriations bill or regulatory measure.

What the text implies

  • Section 11 waivers are extraordinarily broad: the Nation waives claims for water rights injuries 'from time immemorial' and 'thereafter, forever,' including damages to hunting, fishing, gathering, and cultural rights due to water loss. This forecloses litigation for harms that predate the settlement and may not yet be fully quantified.
  • Section 6(6)(b) places all operation and maintenance costs for the Cragin-Verde Pipeline on the Yavapai-Apache Nation and other beneficiaries on a pro-rata basis after construction completion. The Nation's long-term financial burden for pipeline O&M is not capped and could grow with inflation or system aging.

The full analysis lists 5 implications of this text.

Who stands to gain

Yavapai-Apache Nation (water rights, infrastructure, trust funds); Salt River Project (SRP) (receives proportional cost reimbursement for Cragin Dam operations; assume; construction contractors (pipeline and treatment facility design/build)

Correlative observation from public records — not evidence of coordination or wrongdoing, and not financial advice.
This page is the record as of today. The app tells you when it changes.
Quorum analysis of the full bill text · 119th Congress · public record