QuorumCivic. Hidden in plain sight Get the app
Bill intelligence

Congress pauses H-1B visas for 3 years, then caps program at 25,000 annually

H.R. 8443 — End H–1B Visa Abuse Act of 2026 · Filed by Eli Crane (R-AZ) · 12 cosponsors · Introduced Apr 22, 2026 · Referred to committee

65%
Transparency
Typical bill: 82%
25/100
Hidden-provision risk
Typical bill: 15/100
High concernLabor Protectionism via Immigration…

Your members of Congress

Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.

Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.

What it does

This bill imposes a three-year pause on all new H-1B visa issuance and, once that pause ends, drastically restricts the program by capping it at 25,000 visas per year (down from current ~85,000), requiring employers to pay H-1B workers at least $200,000 annually, imposing a $100,000 fee per petition, eliminating the visa lottery, banning concurrent employment and staffing agencies, barring H-1B workers from federal employment, eliminating Optional Practical Training for foreign students, and blocking H-1B visa holders from adjusting to permanent residency or changing visa status. The bill benefits U.S. workers by reducing foreign labor competition and raising wage floors; it harms employers reliant on H-1B talent, international students, and foreign nationals seeking U.S. employment.

Why we flagged it

The bill's core mechanism is to reduce foreign labor supply and raise wage floors for H-1B workers through a combination of numerical caps, fee increases, and eligibility restrictions. While framed as anti-abuse, the operative effect is protectionist labor policy favoring domestic workers over foreign talent and employers.

What the text implies

  • The $100,000 annual fee per H-1B petition may be passed to employers' customers, raising costs for consumers in tech, healthcare, and other sectors reliant on H-1B labor.
  • Elimination of Optional Practical Training (OPT) for foreign students may reduce U.S. university enrollment and competitiveness in attracting international talent, with long-term effects on research and innovation funding.

The full analysis lists 5 implications of this text.

Who stands to gain

domestic workers in tech, healthcare, and professional services (wage protection); labor unions and worker advocacy organizations (reduced competition); domestic staffing and recruitment firms (reduced competition from third-party H-1B agencies)

Correlative observation from public records — not evidence of coordination or wrongdoing, and not financial advice.
This page is the record as of today. The app tells you when it changes.
Quorum analysis of the full bill text · 119th Congress · public record