QuorumCivic. Hidden in plain sight Get the app
Bill intelligence

Federal climate funds now tied to state land-purchase bans on foreign nationals

H.R. 1184 — Stop CCP Land Act · Filed by Stephanie Bice (R-OK) · 11 cosponsors · Introduced Feb 11, 2025 · Referred to committee

75%
Transparency
Typical bill: 82%
25/100
Hidden-provision risk
Typical bill: 15/100
Conditional Federal Funding / Foreign Land…

Your members of Congress

Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.

Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.

What it does

This bill makes federal funding conditional on state action: states cannot receive certain federal climate, agriculture, and infrastructure funds unless they pass laws prohibiting citizens of designated foreign countries (China, Russia, and others on the State Department's Defense Trade Control list) from buying agricultural land, and requiring existing foreign landholders to file annual reports. The bill benefits states that comply and federal oversight of foreign agricultural investment; it restricts foreign nationals' property rights and conditions federal aid on state legislative action.

Why we flagged it

The bill's operative mechanism is a conditional-funding requirement: states must pass foreign-land-purchase restrictions to receive federal climate and agriculture funds. It is not primarily a land-purchase ban (which would be federal regulation) but a state-incentive structure tied to federal appropriations.

What the text implies

  • States with strong agricultural sectors or climate-vulnerable regions face pressure to restrict foreign investment even if they believe it economically beneficial, creating a federal mandate-by-funding-condition rather than direct federal regulation.
  • The bill defines 'covered foreign country' by reference to the State Department's Defense Trade Control list, which is subject to executive-branch revision; future administrations could expand or contract the list without congressional action, changing which nationals are restricted.

The full analysis lists 4 implications of this text.

Who stands to gain

domestic agricultural land buyers (potential price reduction from restricted foreign competition); states that comply (retain federal funding for climate, agriculture, and rural programs)

Correlative observation from public records — not evidence of coordination or wrongdoing, and not financial advice.
This page is the record as of today. The app tells you when it changes.
Quorum analysis of the full bill text · 119th Congress · public record