Congress locks in life sentences for illegal reentry, removes judges' discretion
H.R. 3486 — Stop Illegal Entry Act of 2025 · Filed by Stephanie Bice (R-OK) · 5 cosponsors · Introduced May 19, 2025 · Passed chamber
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill increases criminal penalties for illegal border entry and reentry after removal. It raises the base penalty for illegal entry from 2 to 5 years imprisonment, and creates a new 5-year mandatory minimum for illegal entrants who are later convicted of crimes carrying over 1 year sentences. For aliens who reenter after removal, it establishes a 10-year maximum penalty, with 15-year maximums for those with prior drug or violent crime convictions, 10-year mandatory minimums for those with aggravated felonies or felony convictions, and life sentences possible in certain cases.
Why we flagged it
The bill's core function is to increase criminal penalties for immigration violations—specifically illegal entry and reentry after removal. It does not create new crimes but substantially raises sentences for existing violations under the Immigration and Nationality Act.
What the text implies
- Mandatory minimum sentences remove judicial discretion to consider individual circumstances, potentially resulting in disproportionate sentences for first-time or low-level offenders.
- The 10-year mandatory minimum for any felony reentry (subsection (c)(2)) applies regardless of the severity or nature of the prior felony conviction, creating uniform harsh penalties across disparate conduct.
- Life sentence eligibility for reentry after removal may be imposed on individuals whose only federal crime is illegal reentry, absent any violent offense.
- The bill's definition of 'removal' in subsection (b)(2) includes stipulated removals during criminal trials, potentially capturing individuals who agreed to removal as part of plea negotiations.
- Increased penalties may disproportionately affect asylum seekers and family-unit migrants who lack sophisticated legal counsel and may not understand the severity of reentry consequences.
Section numbers refer to the bill text the analysis read — linked under Primary records below.
Who it affects
The bill imposes substantially harsher criminal penalties on a vulnerable population (undocumented immigrants and those reentering after removal), with mandatory minimums that limit judicial discretion and may result in disproportionate sentences for individuals with limited criminal histories. While border enforcement is a legitimate government function, the severity of the penalties—particularly mandatory 10-year minimums for felony reentry and life sentences—and the removal of judicial discre
Who stands to gain
- federal prison system (increased incarceration volume)
- private prison operators (if applicable to federal system)
- criminal defense contractors
Named in the bill
Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Nationality Act, Section 275 (INA), Section 276 (INA), Section 235(c) (INA), Section 212(a)(3)(B) (INA), Title V (INA), Section 241(a)(4)(B) (INA), Title 18 United States Code
Where it stands
5 cosponsors: 5 Republicans.
- May 19, 2025 — Introduced · Congress.gov: “Introduced in House”
- May 19, 2025 — Referred to House Committee on the Judiciary · Congress.gov: “Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary”
- May 21, 2025 — Markup held in committee · Congress.gov: “Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held”
- May 21, 2025 — Reported out of committee · Congress.gov: “Ordered to be Reported in the Nature of a Substitute by the Yeas and Nays: 14 - 10”
- Sep 11, 2025 — Passed the House · Congress.gov: “On passage Passed by the Yeas and Nays: 226 - 197 (Roll no. 264).”
Dates and quoted wording are Congress.gov's action record; the timeline shows status changes, not every procedural step.
Money around this bill
2 lobbying clients named this bill on 3 disclosure filings across 2 quarters, Dec 2025 to Jun 2026. Those filings disclosed $50,000 in lobbying spend. A filing names 29 bills on average, so that figure is what each filing reported, not a share belonging to this bill.
More lobbying clients named this bill than 41% of bills with at least one filing.
Stephanie Bice, the sponsor, reported $1,071,750 in PAC receipts in the 2026 cycle.
- International Union of Police Associations AFL-CIO — $40,000 on 2 filings
- Casa, Inc. — $10,000 on 1 filing
Lobbying Disclosure Act filings through Jul 10, 2026. A filing shows who paid to lobby on a bill it names, not what changed.
How this was measured
Analysis — Quorum's AI read the bill text published by Congress.gov (4,723 characters) on Jul 9, 2026. Section numbers in the findings refer to that text, linked below; transparency and hidden-provision scores are compared against the median of 16,222 analysed bills.
Status and sponsors — Congress.gov's bill record — actions, committee referrals and cosponsors — loaded nightly. The timeline shows status changes, not every procedural action.
Money — Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act filings whose specific-issue field names this bill for quarters ending Dec 2025 to Jun 2026. A filing's amount is reported whole beside the median number of bills a filing names; it is never divided across them. PAC receipts are FEC-reported contributions to the sponsor's candidate committee in the 2026 cycle.
As of — lobbying records through Jul 10, 2026 · page rendered 2026-10-20.
“Congress locks in life sentences for illegal reentry, removes judges' discretion” QuorumCivic. https://share.quorumcivic.app/bill/119/hr3486 Report an error
The week in bills
One email, Sunday: what Congress passed, what it changed, and who paid.
One link arrives to confirm the address. It is used for this email and nothing else, and every issue carries an unsubscribe link.