Congress signals disapproval of non-English anthem performances
H.Con.Res. 43 — Expressing the sense of Congress that any public rendition of "The Star-Spangled Banner" must be performed as written by Francis Scott Key, in English. · Filed by Stephanie Bice (R-OK) · 11 cosponsors · Introduced Jul 10, 2025 · Referred to committee
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This is a non-binding congressional resolution expressing that the national anthem should be performed in English as originally written by Francis Scott Key, without alterations or translations. It carries no legal force—it is a statement of congressional opinion only, not a law that restricts anyone's conduct or creates enforceable obligations.
Why we flagged it
This is a concurrent resolution—a non-binding statement of congressional sentiment. It expresses a preference about how the national anthem should be performed but creates no law, appropriation, or enforceable mandate. Its sole function is to place Congress on record.
What the text implies
- Non-binding resolutions can influence cultural norms and performer behavior without legal force, creating a chilling effect on artistic expression and linguistic diversity in patriotic contexts.
- The resolution's emphasis on 'original English' and 'historical integrity' may be interpreted as discouraging multilingual or artistic renditions, potentially affecting performers and event organizers who wish to honor the anthem in other languages or styles.
- Congressional messaging on cultural practices, even non-binding, can amplify political pressure on broadcasters, venues, and performers to conform to a single approved version.
Who it affects
As a non-binding resolution, this bill creates no legal restrictions or new rights for citizens. It is a symbolic statement of congressional preference. However, it may signal congressional disapproval of anthem performances in other languages or styles, which could chill free expression and cultural participation without legal consequence—a form of soft pressure rather than hard law.
Named in the bill
Francis Scott Key, U.S. House of Representatives, Committee on the Judiciary, Mrs. Bice, Mr. Rogers of Alabama, Mr. Moore of Alabama, Mr. Feenstra, Mr. Murphy, Mrs. Miller-Meeks, Mr. Downing, Mrs. Houchin, Mr. Carter of Georgia
Where it stands
11 cosponsors: 11 Republicans.
- Jul 10, 2025 — Referred to House Committee on the Judiciary · Congress.gov: “Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary”
Dates and quoted wording are Congress.gov's action record; the timeline shows status changes, not every procedural step.
How this was measured
Analysis — Quorum's AI read the full bill text on Jul 6, 2026; transparency and hidden-provision scores are compared against the median of 16,222 analysed bills.
Status and sponsors — Congress.gov's bill record — actions, committee referrals and cosponsors — loaded nightly. The timeline shows status changes, not every procedural action.
As of — page rendered 2026-10-20.
“Congress signals disapproval of non-English anthem performances” QuorumCivic. https://share.quorumcivic.app/bill/119/hconres43 Report an error
The week in bills
One email, Sunday: what Congress passed, what it changed, and who paid.
One link arrives to confirm the address. It is used for this email and nothing else, and every issue carries an unsubscribe link.