Congress signals disapproval of non-English anthem performances
H.Con.Res. 43 — Expressing the sense of Congress that any public rendition of "The Star-Spangled Banner" must be performed as written by Francis Scott Key, in English. · Filed by Stephanie Bice (R-OK) · 11 cosponsors · Introduced Jul 10, 2025 · Referred to committee
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This is a non-binding congressional resolution expressing that the national anthem should be performed in English as originally written by Francis Scott Key, without alterations or translations. It carries no legal force—it is a statement of congressional opinion only, not a law that restricts anyone's conduct or creates enforceable obligations.
Why we flagged it
This is a concurrent resolution—a non-binding statement of congressional sentiment. It expresses a preference about how the national anthem should be performed but creates no law, appropriation, or enforceable mandate. Its sole function is to place Congress on record.
What the text implies
- Non-binding resolutions can influence cultural norms and performer behavior without legal force, creating a chilling effect on artistic expression and linguistic diversity in patriotic contexts.
- The resolution's emphasis on 'original English' and 'historical integrity' may be interpreted as discouraging multilingual or artistic renditions, potentially affecting performers and event organizers who wish to honor the anthem in other languages or styles.
The full analysis lists 3 implications of this text.
Who it affects
As a non-binding resolution, this bill creates no legal restrictions or new rights for citizens. It is a symbolic statement of congressional preference.