Congress tightens foreign-adversary grip on U.S. farmland near military bases
S. 903 — PASS Act · Filed by Mike Rounds (R-SD) · 6 cosponsors · Introduced Mar 6, 2025 · Referred to committee
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill amends the Defense Production Act to give the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS) new power to review and block foreign acquisitions of agricultural land and agricultural businesses near U.S. military installations or sensitive government facilities. It specifically targets foreign persons acting on behalf of four named adversary countries—China, Russia, Iran, and North Korea—and requires the Secretary of Agriculture to notify CFIUS of reportable agricultural land transactions within 30 days. The President may prohibit such transactions unless the foreign buyer voluntarily abandons the deal, with a national-interest waiver available on a case-by-case basis.
Why we flagged it
The bill's core function is to expand CFIUS authority to screen and block foreign acquisitions of agricultural land and agribusiness near military installations by state-directed actors from adversary nations. It is a national-security measure, not a trade or economic policy.
What the text implies
- The bill defines 'covered foreign person' to include any foreign entity acting 'at the direction or control of' an adversary government, which may capture private companies with indirect state ties or joint ventures, potentially broadening the scope beyond direct state ownership.
- The 'close proximity' standard for agricultural land near military installations is delegated to CFIUS regulations, creating regulatory discretion that could expand or contract the geographic scope of blocked transactions without further congressional action.
The full analysis lists 4 implications of this text.
Who stands to gain
U.S. agricultural landowners (protected from foreign acquisition pressure); U.S. agribusiness companies (reduced foreign acquisition risk); Defense contractors and military-adjacent industries (enhanced security perimeter protection)