Congress demands a map of global mineral power—and a plan to break China's grip
S. 789 — Critical Minerals Security Act of 2025 · Filed by John Cornyn (R-TX) · 6 cosponsors · Introduced Feb 27, 2025 · Reported out
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill requires the Interior Department to report annually on global critical mineral and rare earth element supplies—tracking which are controlled by U.S. adversaries, allies, or the U.S. itself—and to develop a strategy for advancing U.S. and allied mining and processing technologies. It also establishes a process for U.S. companies to notify the government before divesting from foreign mining operations, potentially receiving help finding non-adversary buyers.
Why we flagged it
The bill's operative mechanism is information-gathering and technology-development strategy aimed at reducing U.S. dependence on adversarial sources of critical minerals—a national-security and economic-resilience measure, not a subsidy or deregulation.
What the text implies
- The divestment-notification process may create a de facto screening mechanism for foreign mining investments by U.S. entities, potentially chilling private capital flows to certain regions without formal legal prohibition.
- Intellectual-property sharing with allied governments could accelerate mining and processing in allied nations, shifting competitive advantage away from current U.S. mining operators toward allied competitors.
The full analysis lists 4 implications of this text.
Who stands to gain
U.S. and allied mining companies (through strategic positioning and technology access); Advanced mining and processing technology developers; Recycling and separation technology firms