QuorumCivic. Hidden in plain sight Get the app
Bill intelligence

Senate endorses Iran strikes, slips in Nobel Prize nomination for Trump

S.Res. 307 — A resolution expressing the sense of the Senate in support of the recent United States and Israeli military strikes on Iran. · Filed by John Cornyn (R-TX) · 16 cosponsors · Introduced Jun 26, 2025 · Referred to committee

85%
Transparency
Typical bill: 82%
35/100
Hidden-provision risk
Typical bill: 15/100
1
Unrelated riders
No connection to the stated subject
High concernForeign Policy Endorsement with Vanity Rider

Your members of Congress

Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.

Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.

What it does

This Senate resolution expresses support for recent U.S. and Israeli military strikes against Iran's nuclear facilities and military targets. The resolution documents Iran's nuclear program expansion over two decades, cites intelligence assessments that Iran could produce nuclear weapons, and endorses the Trump administration's military operations (Operation Midnight Hammer and Operation Rising Lion) as necessary to prevent Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons.

Why we flagged it

The core function is a sense-of-the-Senate resolution supporting military strikes on Iran. However, the resolution includes a clause praising the Trump administration and nominating the sitting president for the Nobel Peace Prize—an unusual ego provision embedded in a foreign policy statement.

  • Clause praising Trump administration and nominating sitting President Trump for Nobel Peace Prize for military action—unrelated to core military-strike endorsement.

What the text implies

  • Resolution forecloses Senate debate on diplomatic alternatives, civilian harm, or regional consequences by framing military action as already justified and praiseworthy.
  • Nomination of sitting president for Nobel Peace Prize in a legislative resolution sets precedent for using foreign policy resolutions as presidential vanity vehicles.

The full analysis lists 4 implications of this text.

Who stands to gain

defense contractors; aerospace and missile manufacturers; military equipment suppliers

Correlative observation from public records — not evidence of coordination or wrongdoing, and not financial advice.
This page is the record as of today. The app tells you when it changes.
Quorum analysis of the full bill text · 119th Congress · public record