QuorumCivic. Hidden in plain sight Get the app
Bill intelligence

Congress mandates AI chatbot warnings for older adults, crisis detection

S. 5117 — Senior Chatbot Protection Act of 2026 · Filed by Mark Kelly (D-AZ) · 1 cosponsor · Introduced Jul 23, 2026 · Referred to committee

82%
Transparency
Typical bill: 82%
15/100
Hidden-provision risk
Typical bill: 15/100
Consumer Protection and Transparency Mandate

Your members of Congress

Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.

Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.

What it does

This bill requires AI chatbot companies to clearly disclose when users are talking to a bot (not a human), warn users before they rely on chatbots for major life decisions (medical, legal, financial, estate planning), detect and refer users in crisis to the 988 Suicide Lifeline, and delete user conversation history on request. It imposes special protections for older adults, restricts companies from using manipulative design to trap users in conversations, and requires annual reporting of serious incidents to the FTC and NIH. The FTC enforces violations as unfair trade practices, with civil penalties up to $50,000 per violation.

Why we flagged it

The bill's operative mechanism is a set of mandatory disclosures, safety protocols, and data-protection rules for AI chatbot operators, enforced by the FTC. It is fundamentally a consumer-protection statute, not a subsidy, deregulation, or industry carve-out.

What the text implies

  • The bill's definition of 'high-stakes decision' is broad and includes estate planning, guardianship, and financial decisions—areas where older adults are vulnerable to manipulation. The FTC's rulemaking authority to expand this category (Section 2(7)) could significantly widen compliance obligations if new categories are added.
  • Crisis detection relies on 'evidence-based methods' and NIST guidance (Section 3(1)(D)), but the bill does not specify what those methods are or how accurate they must be. A chatbot that fails to detect a crisis, or falsely detects one, may face liability, creating incentive to over-refer and potentially desensitize users to crisis warnings.

The full analysis lists 5 implications of this text.

Who it affects

Ordinary users gain concrete protections: mandatory disclosure that they're talking to a bot, warnings before relying on chatbots for high-stakes decisions, crisis detection and referral, and the right to delete their conversation history. Older adults receive heightened safeguards against manipulative design.

Correlative observation from public records — not evidence of coordination or wrongdoing, and not financial advice.
This page is the record as of today. The app tells you when it changes.
Quorum analysis of the full bill text · 119th Congress · public record