QuorumCivic. Hidden in plain sight Get the app
Bill intelligence

Congress gives AI giants legal cover to coordinate product delays

S. 5105 — Collaboration on Adversarial Threats and Security Risks Act · Filed by Adam Schiff (D-CA) · 1 cosponsor · Introduced Jul 23, 2026 · Referred to committee

35%
Transparency
Typical bill: 82%
68/100
Hidden-provision risk
Typical bill: 15/100
Critical concernAI Industry Antitrust Carve-out

Your members of Congress

Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.

Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.

What it does

This bill creates an antitrust exemption allowing AI companies to share information and coordinate on delaying or limiting AI releases when they claim to be addressing national security risks from AI (theft, weaponization, critical infrastructure threats, loss of control, autonomous self-improvement, or unauthorized access). Companies must notify the Department of Justice in advance of coordinated delays and prove their actions were in good faith and exclusively for security purposes; the government can still seek injunctions if companies fail to meet the burden of proof or if the coordination actually increases security risks overall.

Why we flagged it

The bill's operative mechanism is a broad antitrust exemption for AI companies to coordinate on product delays and information sharing, justified by national security framing but lacking meaningful guardrails. The exemption is the bill's core function, not a side effect.

What the text implies

  • The exemption applies to 'coordination' on 'delaying or otherwise limiting' AI release/deployment with only advance notice to DOJ—no approval required. This permits competitors to jointly delay products without antitrust liability, potentially suppressing innovation and consumer access.
  • All notices and information submitted to DOJ are permanently secret under FOIA exemption (5 U.S.C. § 552), preventing public scrutiny of which companies coordinated, on what timeline, or whether claimed security risks were real.

The full analysis lists 5 implications of this text.

Who stands to gain

large AI development companies (OpenAI, Google DeepMind, Meta, Anthropic, Microsoft); AI infrastructure and chip manufacturers; cloud computing providers offering AI services

Correlative observation from public records — not evidence of coordination or wrongdoing, and not financial advice.
This page is the record as of today. The app tells you when it changes.
Quorum analysis of the full bill text · 119th Congress · public record