QuorumCivic. Hidden in plain sight Get the app
Bill intelligence

Congress toughens child labor penalties and extends liability to successor companies

S. 4817 — CHILD Labor Act · Filed by Patty Murray (D-WA) · 10 cosponsors · Introduced Jun 17, 2026 · Referred to committee

65%
Transparency
Typical bill: 82%
15/100
Hidden-provision risk
Typical bill: 15/100
Child Labor Enforcement Strengthening

Your members of Congress

Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.

Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.

What it does

This bill strengthens federal child labor protections by imposing steep penalties on employers who violate child labor laws, expanding liability to successor companies that inherit operations from violators, and requiring federal contractors to certify they do not employ children under 16 or use oppressive child labor for ages 16–17. It also creates new enforcement tools (stop-work orders, tagging of goods), raises civil and criminal penalties significantly, extends the statute of limitations to 10 years, and mandates training and reporting on child labor violations.

Why we flagged it

The bill's core function is to expand and toughen enforcement of existing child labor prohibitions under the Fair Labor Standards Act, primarily through higher penalties, extended liability, new enforcement tools, and federal contractor requirements. It is not a new substantive prohibition but a reinforcement and expansion of existing law.

What the text implies

  • Successor-in-interest liability may create unintended consequences for legitimate business acquisitions and restructurings; companies acquiring operations may face joint liability for historical violations they did not commit, potentially chilling M&A activity in certain sectors.
  • Stop-work orders without geographic limitation (applying to all worksites of a violator, not just those involved in the violation) may halt lawful operations and harm innocent workers, though the bill requires compensation for lost wages.

The full analysis lists 5 implications of this text.

Who stands to gain

plaintiff employment attorneys; labor advocacy organizations; compliance consulting firms

Correlative observation from public records — not evidence of coordination or wrongdoing, and not financial advice.
This page is the record as of today. The app tells you when it changes.
Quorum analysis of the full bill text · 119th Congress · public record