Congress strips employers' power to ban workers from suing
S. 5190 — Restoring Justice for Workers Act · Filed by Patty Murray (D-WA) · 17 cosponsors · Introduced Jul 30, 2026 · Referred to committee
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill prohibits employers from forcing workers to sign away their right to sue in court or join class-action lawsuits as a condition of employment. It bans predispute arbitration agreements and class-action waivers in employment contracts, and requires any postdispute arbitration agreements to be truly voluntary—with a 45-day waiting period, plain-language disclosure, and explicit written consent. Workers who are retaliated against for refusing to sign such waivers can sue for damages and attorney fees.
Why we flagged it
The bill's core mechanism is restoring workers' access to courts and collective remedies by invalidating forced arbitration and class-action waivers. It is fundamentally a labor-rights protection measure, not a procedural or technical amendment.
What the text implies
- Employers may respond by raising hiring standards, reducing hiring, or shifting to independent-contractor models to avoid coverage—potentially reducing job availability for lower-skilled workers.
- The 45-day waiting period and disclosure requirements create administrative friction that may deter some workers from signing postdispute agreements, even when genuinely voluntary, reducing settlement efficiency.
- Courts will face a significant increase in employment litigation, potentially straining judicial resources and delaying resolution of individual claims.
- Employers' litigation costs and exposure to class actions will increase substantially, which may be passed to consumers via higher prices or to workers via lower wages in competitive markets.
Section numbers refer to the bill text the analysis read — linked under Primary records below.
Who it affects
Ordinary workers gain enforceable rights to access courts and join collective actions to challenge wage theft, discrimination, and safety violations—remedies that are often the only affordable way to hold employers accountable. Employers lose the ability to unilaterally strip workers of legal recourse, reducing the structural power imbalance that has allowed widespread labor-rights violations to go unchecked.
Who stands to gain
- plaintiff employment law firms
- class-action litigation specialists
- workers' rights advocacy organizations
Named in the bill
National Labor Relations Board, Federal Arbitration Act, Fair Labor Standards Act, Epic Systems Corp. v. Lewis, U.S. District Courts, Civil Rights Act of 1964
Where it stands
17 cosponsors: 15 Democrats, 2 Independents.
- Jul 30, 2026 — Introduced · Congress.gov: “Introduced in Senate”
- Jul 30, 2026 — Referred to Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions · Congress.gov: “Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions”
Dates and quoted wording are Congress.gov's action record; the timeline shows status changes, not every procedural step.
How this was measured
Analysis — Quorum's AI read the bill text published by Congress.gov (12,627 characters) on Aug 6, 2026. Section numbers in the findings refer to that text, linked below; transparency and hidden-provision scores are compared against the median of 16,222 analysed bills.
Status and sponsors — Congress.gov's bill record — actions, committee referrals and cosponsors — loaded nightly. The timeline shows status changes, not every procedural action.
As of — page rendered 2026-10-20.
“Congress strips employers' power to ban workers from suing” QuorumCivic. https://share.quorumcivic.app/bill/119/s5190 Report an error
The week in bills
One email, Sunday: what Congress passed, what it changed, and who paid.
One link arrives to confirm the address. It is used for this email and nothing else, and every issue carries an unsubscribe link.