QuorumCivic. Hidden in plain sight Get the app
Bill intelligence

Forest Service forced to prioritize timber sales over environmental review

S. 480 — Timber Harvesting Restoration Act of 2025 · Filed by Mike Rounds (R-SD) · Introduced Feb 6, 2025 · Referred to committee

75%
Transparency
Typical bill: 85%
35/100
Hidden-provision risk
Typical bill: 15/100
High concernTimber Industry Extraction Mandate

Your members of Congress

Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.

Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.

What it does

This bill requires forest supervisors managing National Forests that are selling less than two-thirds of their allowable timber volume to submit plans within 180 days explaining how to increase timber sales. If a forest is still below three-quarters of its allowable volume after one year, the supervisor must submit another plan. The bill directs the Forest Service to allocate resources to boost timber harvesting, including expediting environmental reviews.

Why we flagged it

The bill's core mechanism is a regulatory mandate forcing forest supervisors to increase timber sales from public lands and directing the Forest Service to allocate resources and expedite environmental review to achieve extraction targets. This is a direct subsidy to timber interests disguised as a management efficiency measure.

What the text implies

  • Expedited environmental review processes may bypass or weaken protections for endangered species, water quality, and soil conservation that normally apply to timber sales.
  • The bill creates performance pressure on forest supervisors tied to timber volume, not forest health or ecosystem services, potentially incentivizing unsustainable harvesting practices.
  • Consultation with 'private industry' is mandated alongside consultation with tribes and local governments, elevating timber companies' voice in planning decisions affecting public lands.
  • The 'good neighbor agreements' authority referenced allows states and private contractors to conduct timber sales on federal land with reduced federal oversight, further privatizing public resource extraction.

Section numbers refer to the bill text the analysis read — linked under Primary records below.

Who it affects

The bill prioritizes timber volume over environmental protection and public input. It pressures forest supervisors to increase logging on public lands, expedites environmental reviews that normally protect watersheds and wildlife, and subordinates conservation and recreational values to extraction targets. Citizens who depend on clean water, wildlife habitat, and public forest access bear the cost.

Who stands to gain

  • timber companies and logging contractors
  • wood products manufacturers
  • forest products distributors

Named in the bill

National Forest System, Forest Service, Secretary of Agriculture, forest supervisors, timber industry, state and local governments, tribal governments, Agricultural Act of 2014 (section 8206)

Where it stands

  • Feb 6, 2025 — Introduced · Congress.gov: “Introduced in Senate”
  • Feb 6, 2025 — Referred to Senate Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry · Congress.gov: “Read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry”

Dates and quoted wording are Congress.gov's action record; the timeline shows status changes, not every procedural step.

How this was measured

Analysis — Quorum's AI read the bill text published by Congress.gov (4,125 characters) on May 21, 2026. Section numbers in the findings refer to that text, linked below; transparency and hidden-provision scores are compared against the median of 16,222 analysed bills.

Status and sponsors — Congress.gov's bill record — actions, committee referrals and cosponsors — loaded nightly. The timeline shows status changes, not every procedural action.

As of — page rendered 2026-10-20.

“Forest Service forced to prioritize timber sales over environmental review” QuorumCivic. https://share.quorumcivic.app/bill/119/s480 Report an error

Correlative observation from public records — not evidence of coordination or wrongdoing, and not financial advice.
This page is the record as of today. The app tells you when it changes.
Quorum analysis of the full bill text · 119th Congress · public record

The week in bills

One email, Sunday: what Congress passed, what it changed, and who paid.

One link arrives to confirm the address. It is used for this email and nothing else, and every issue carries an unsubscribe link.