QuorumCivic. Hidden in plain sight Get the app
Bill intelligence

Forest Service ordered to prioritize timber sales over environmental review

S. 480 — Timber Harvesting Restoration Act of 2025 · Filed by Mike Rounds (R-SD) · Introduced Feb 6, 2025 · Referred to committee

65%
Transparency
Typical bill: 82%
35/100
Hidden-provision risk
Typical bill: 15/100
High concernTimber Industry Subsidy via Regulatory…

Your members of Congress

Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.

Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.

What it does

This bill requires the U.S. Forest Service to identify and implement ways to increase timber harvesting on federal lands that are currently selling less than two-thirds of their allowable timber volume. Forest supervisors must submit plans within 180 days, take action within a year, and face repeated reporting requirements if they fail to boost sales toward 75% of the allowable amount. The bill directs the Forest Service to allocate resources and expedite environmental reviews to support higher timber sales.

Why we flagged it

The bill's core mechanism is to mandate increased timber sales from federal forests and expedite environmental review to achieve that goal. While framed as a 'restoration' of harvesting, it functions as a de facto subsidy to timber companies by guaranteeing market access and reducing regulatory friction, without requiring timber operators to pay for the accelerated permitting or environmental shortcuts.

What the text implies

  • Expedited environmental review may reduce public notice-and-comment periods, limiting citizen input on forest management decisions that affect water quality, wildlife, and carbon storage.
  • The bill creates performance pressure on Forest Service personnel to prioritize timber volume over ecological sustainability, potentially shifting agency culture away from balanced multiple-use management.

The full analysis lists 4 implications of this text.

Who stands to gain

timber companies; forest products manufacturers; logging contractors

Correlative observation from public records — not evidence of coordination or wrongdoing, and not financial advice.
This page is the record as of today. The app tells you when it changes.
Quorum analysis of the full bill text · 119th Congress · public record