Banks banned from collecting immigration data—with a major loophole
S. 4450 — Financial Access Protection Act · Filed by Angela Alsobrooks (D-MD) · Introduced Apr 30, 2026 · Referred to committee
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill prohibits banks, credit unions, and credit reporting agencies from collecting, maintaining, or sharing information about a customer's citizenship or immigration status—except where required by anti-money-laundering and sanctions laws. It also bars federal banking regulators from pressuring financial institutions to collect such data or using it in supervisory decisions.
Why we flagged it
The bill's core function is to restrict financial institutions' ability to collect and report immigration status data, framed as a consumer privacy and access measure. It is not a deregulation or a carve-out for a specific sector, but rather a constraint on data collection practices.
What the text implies
- The Bank Secrecy Act carve-out may allow regulators and financial institutions to infer or collect immigration status indirectly through AML/sanctions screening, potentially undermining the bill's stated intent if not carefully implemented.
- Banks may face compliance uncertainty: the bill prohibits collection but does not clarify how institutions should handle immigration-status data already in their systems or obtained through third-party vendors.
The full analysis lists 4 implications of this text.
Who stands to gain
immigrant-focused fintech and community banks; credit unions serving immigrant communities; consumer advocacy organizations