Congress blocks CFPB's debt-collection fee rollback, restoring consumer protection
S.J.Res. 125 — A joint resolution providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection relating to the withdrawal of the rule relating to "Debt Collection Practices (Regulation F); Pay-to-Pay Fees". · Filed by Angela Alsobrooks (D-MD) · Introduced Mar 17, 2026 · Reported out
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This resolution uses the Congressional Review Act to block a CFPB rule that withdrew consumer protections against 'pay-to-pay' fees in debt collection. By disapproving the CFPB's withdrawal, Congress restores the original debt-collection rule that banned or restricted fees charged to consumers for making payments on debts. Debt collectors lose the ability to charge these fees; consumers regain protection.
Why we flagged it
The bill's sole function is to restore a debt-collection consumer protection by voiding a CFPB withdrawal. It is a straightforward Congressional Review Act disapproval with no riders or hidden provisions.
What the text implies
- Restoring the rule may increase compliance costs for debt-collection firms, potentially reducing their profit margins on collection activity or forcing them to absorb pay-to-pay fees as a cost of business.
- The resolution does not address whether the original rule itself remains subject to future CFPB withdrawal or modification; it only blocks THIS particular withdrawal action.
Who it affects
Consumers regain a direct protection: debt collectors cannot charge fees for the act of paying a debt. This eliminates a predatory practice that trapped low-income debtors in cycles of additional charges.