Federal ban on transgender youth care creates $100K penalties and 25-year lawsuit window
S. 4426 — STOP Act · Filed by Roger Marshall (R-KS) · 1 cosponsor · Introduced Apr 29, 2026 · Referred to committee
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill prohibits anyone from performing gender transition procedures on minors under 18, with federal enforcement through civil penalties of at least $100,000 per violation and a private right of action allowing minors (or their parents/guardians) to sue for damages. It establishes a federal grant program to fund nonprofit organizations that counsel minors on reversing prior gender transition procedures and provide detransition services, while barring grant recipients from performing or referring for gender transition procedures or abortions (with narrow exceptions).
Why we flagged it
The bill's core mechanism is a federal prohibition on a category of medical procedures for minors, enforced through civil penalties and private litigation, paired with a grant program that funds only organizations aligned with a detransition-focused ideology. This is not primarily a public-health measure but a federal override of state medical regulation and parental authority, coupled with selective funding for ideologically compatible providers.
- Section 4 grant program restricts eligibility to entities that do not perform, refer for, or counsel in favor of abortion (except rape/incest/life endangerment), unrelated to the bill's stated purpose of supporting detransition.
What the text implies
- The bill's definition of 'gender transition procedure' is extraordinarily broad, encompassing cosmetic surgeries, voice surgery, and hair reconstruction—procedures that may be sought for reasons unrelated to gender identity, creating ambiguity in enforcement and potential chilling effects on legitimate medical care.
- The 25-year statute of limitations for private civil actions (extending to age 43) creates indefinite liability exposure for healthcare providers, potentially deterring them from treating minors in related areas even if the bill's prohibition is narrowly construed.
The full analysis lists 5 implications of this text.
Who stands to gain
nonprofit organizations specializing in detransition counseling and services; legal firms specializing in medical liability litigation