QuorumCivic. Hidden in plain sight Get the app
Bill intelligence

Congress moves to kill EPA's phasedown of climate-damaging refrigerant gases

S.J.Res. 14 — A joint resolution providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Environmental Protection Agency relating to "Phasedown of Hydrofluorocarbons: Management of Certain Hydrofluorocarbons and Substitutes Under the American Innovation and Manufacturing Act of 2020". · Filed by Roger Marshall (R-KS) · Introduced Feb 5, 2025 · Referred to committee

95%
Transparency
Typical bill: 82%
15/100
Hidden-provision risk
Typical bill: 15/100
High concernEnvironmental Deregulation via CRA…

Your members of Congress

Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.

Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.

What it does

This resolution disapproves an EPA rule that implements the phasedown of hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs)—potent greenhouse gases used in refrigeration and air conditioning—under the American Innovation and Manufacturing Act of 2020. If passed, the rule would be nullified and have no legal effect, halting EPA enforcement of the HFC phasedown schedule and allowing continued production and use of these ozone-depleting and climate-damaging chemicals.

Why we flagged it

This is a Congressional Review Act (CRA) disapproval resolution targeting an EPA environmental rule. Its sole function is to nullify the HFC phasedown rule, removing federal climate and ozone-protection requirements. The mechanism is procedurally straightforward but substantively deregulatory.

What the text implies

  • Disapproving this rule may trigger CRA's 'same rule' prohibition, preventing EPA from issuing a substantially similar HFC phasedown rule without new congressional authorization—effectively locking in continued HFC production indefinitely.
  • The American Innovation and Manufacturing Act (AIM Act) of 2020 is bipartisan law directing EPA to phase down HFCs; disapproving the implementing rule creates tension with the statute's mandate, potentially inviting litigation over EPA's authority to enforce the underlying law.

The full analysis lists 4 implications of this text.

Who stands to gain

hydrofluorocarbon (HFC) manufacturers; refrigeration and air-conditioning equipment makers using HFCs; chemical suppliers producing HFC blends

Correlative observation from public records — not evidence of coordination or wrongdoing, and not financial advice.
This page is the record as of today. The app tells you when it changes.
Quorum analysis of the full bill text · 119th Congress · public record