Congress changes budget math to freeze spending growth at current levels
S. 4372 — No Bias in the Baseline Act · Filed by Roger Marshall (R-KS) · Introduced Apr 22, 2026 · Referred to committee
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill changes how Congress calculates the 'baseline'—the official projection of future spending and revenues used to measure the fiscal impact of new laws. It mandates that the baseline assume current laws continue unchanged and that discretionary spending stays at current levels, with no adjustments for inflation. This makes it harder for Congress to claim that new spending bills 'save money' compared to baseline, because the baseline itself will not grow for inflation.
Why we flagged it
The bill is a technical amendment to Congressional Budget Act baseline-calculation rules. It does not appropriate money, create new programs, or establish new policy—it changes the accounting framework Congress uses to measure fiscal impact. The operative effect is procedural: it freezes the baseline at current nominal levels and removes inflation adjustments.
What the text implies
- Removes inflation adjustment from baseline, meaning that maintaining current real spending levels will require explicit new appropriations each year—shifting the burden of proof from 'justify new spending' to 'justify maintaining current services.'
- May increase apparent cost of entitlement programs (Social Security, Medicare) if their statutory formulas include inflation indexing, because the baseline will not grow to reflect those formulas.
The full analysis lists 4 implications of this text.
Who it affects
The bill constrains Congress's ability to use baseline accounting to hide the true cost of new spending, which improves fiscal transparency and may discipline spending. However, it also makes it harder to fund inflation-adjusted increases in existing programs (Social Security, Medicare, defense) without explicit new appropriations, potentially shifting pressure toward benefit cuts or tax increases rather than nominal growth.