QuorumCivic. Hidden in plain sight Get the app
Bill intelligence

Congress moves to end tax breaks for private school scholarships

S. 4297 — Keep Public Funds in Public Schools Act · Filed by Mark Kelly (D-AZ) · 34 cosponsors · Introduced Apr 15, 2026 · Referred to committee

85%
Transparency
Typical bill: 82%
15/100
Hidden-provision risk
Typical bill: 15/100
Tax Subsidy Repeal

Your members of Congress

Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.

Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.

What it does

This bill repeals two federal tax benefits for private school scholarships: a tax credit (section 25F) that allowed individuals to deduct contributions to scholarship-granting organizations, and an income exclusion (section 139K) that let recipients exclude scholarship payments from taxable income. The repeal takes effect for tax years ending after December 31, 2026, eliminating a federal subsidy for private school funding.

Why we flagged it

The bill's operative mechanism is the removal of two existing tax benefits for private school scholarships. It is a straightforward repeal of prior tax code provisions, not a new restriction or regulation—it simply eliminates a tax advantage.

What the text implies

  • Repealing section 139K (income exclusion) may affect existing scholarship recipients in 2027 and later, potentially increasing their tax liability retroactively if they received scholarships in 2026 under the old rule and the exclusion is deemed to apply prospectively only—the bill's effective date language ('amounts received after December 31, 2026') suggests prospective application, but ambiguit
  • The bill does not appropriate recovered federal revenue to public schools, so the civic benefit (increased public funding) is contingent on separate appropriations action; without that, the bill is purely a tax increase on private school families with no guaranteed public-education offset.

The full analysis lists 3 implications of this text.

Who it affects

Families using private schools lose tax benefits, raising their net cost; families in public schools see no direct change but may benefit if repealed revenue funds public education. The bill's civic framing assumes public schools are underfunded and private-school tax breaks divert public resources, but the actual fiscal impact on public education depends on whether Congress appropriates the recovered revenue to schools—the bill does not mandate that.

Correlative observation from public records — not evidence of coordination or wrongdoing, and not financial advice.
This page is the record as of today. The app tells you when it changes.
Quorum analysis of the full bill text · 119th Congress · public record