QuorumCivic. Hidden in plain sight Get the app
Bill intelligence

Congress declares cost-of-living emergency, empowers price-gouging crackdown

S. 4266 — Cost-of-living Emergency Act · Filed by Mark Kelly (D-AZ) · Introduced Mar 26, 2026 · Referred to committee

75%
Transparency
Typical bill: 82%
15/100
Hidden-provision risk
Typical bill: 15/100
Consumer Protection & Supply-Chain…

Your members of Congress

Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.

Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.

What it does

This bill declares a 180-day cost-of-living emergency and creates a government task force to monitor and combat price increases in essential goods (food, housing, utilities, fuel, healthcare). It establishes six presidential advisors focused on specific cost categories, requires federal agencies to assess how regulations affect household budgets, empowers the FTC and DOJ to investigate price gouging, and authorizes the President to use Defense Production Act authorities to expand domestic supply of necessities. A bipartisan congressional commission will develop legislative recommendations to address cost-of-living pressures.

Why we flagged it

The bill's core mechanism is establishing emergency enforcement against price gouging, creating a cost-of-living monitoring infrastructure, and using Defense Production Act authorities to expand domestic supply of necessities. While framed as an emergency response, it is functionally a consumer-protection and supply-chain policy.

What the text implies

  • The Defense Production Act authorities in Section 7 allow the President to subsidize domestic production and execute purchase commitments for basic necessities without the traditional 'national defense' requirement—a significant expansion of executive power that could persist beyond the 180-day emergency if Congress extends it.
  • The household costs impact statement requirement (Section 5) may slow or block regulatory actions unrelated to cost-of-living if agencies cannot demonstrate net benefit to households vs. corporations—potentially creating a de facto regulatory freeze on environmental, labor, or safety rules.

The full analysis lists 4 implications of this text.

Who stands to gain

domestic food producers and agricultural suppliers; domestic energy and utility companies; domestic housing construction and real estate

Correlative observation from public records — not evidence of coordination or wrongdoing, and not financial advice.
This page is the record as of today. The app tells you when it changes.
Quorum analysis of the full bill text · 119th Congress · public record