QuorumCivic. Hidden in plain sight Get the app
Bill intelligence

DOE creates nuclear cleanup network, exempts it from transparency rules

S. 3828 — CLEAN SMART Act of 2026 · Filed by Ben Luján (D-NM) · 1 cosponsor · Introduced Feb 11, 2026 · Referred to committee

75%
Transparency
Typical bill: 82%
12/100
Hidden-provision risk
Typical bill: 15/100
Environmental Cleanup Coordination Act

Your members of Congress

Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.

Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.

What it does

This bill establishes a Network of National Laboratories to accelerate nuclear waste cleanup and environmental remediation at Department of Energy sites. It creates a steering committee led by the Savannah River National Laboratory, coordinates research across six core national labs and others, and authorizes $55 million annually for technology development plus $3 million for network operations. The bill aims to lower cleanup costs, speed up site remediation, and improve safety by pooling expertise across the national laboratory system.

Why we flagged it

The bill's core mechanism is establishing a network to coordinate research and technology development for nuclear waste cleanup—a straightforward public-sector coordination and R&D investment. It is not a deregulation, subsidy carve-out, or liability shield; it is a governance and funding structure for an existing federal mission.

What the text implies

  • The Network is exempt from the Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA), which normally requires transparency, public notice, and conflict-of-interest disclosures for federal advisory bodies. This exemption may reduce public visibility into how cleanup priorities and technology decisions are made, though the bill requires annual reporting to Congress.
  • The Savannah River National Laboratory is designated as the permanent Network Chair and 'Corporate Lab,' giving one facility outsized structural authority over cleanup technology decisions across the entire national laboratory system. This concentration of power in a single lab's leadership may create coordination bottlenecks or bias toward that facility's capabilities.

The full analysis lists 4 implications of this text.

Who stands to gain

National Laboratories (management and operating contractors); Environmental remediation technology vendors and contractors; Academic institutions (research partnerships)

Correlative observation from public records — not evidence of coordination or wrongdoing, and not financial advice.
This page is the record as of today. The app tells you when it changes.
Quorum analysis of the full bill text · 119th Congress · public record