QuorumCivic. Hidden in plain sight Get the app
Bill intelligence

Congress moves to restore bank fee protections the CFPB quietly dropped

S.J.Res. 153 — A joint resolution providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection relating to the withdrawal of the rule relating to "Bulletin 2022-06: Unfair Returned Deposited Item Fee Assessment Practices". · Filed by Ben Luján (D-NM) · Introduced Mar 26, 2026 · Referred to committee

82%
Transparency
Typical bill: 85%
8/100
Hidden-provision risk
Typical bill: 15/100
Consumer Fee Protection Restoration

Your members of Congress

Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.

Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.

What it does

This resolution uses the Congressional Review Act to block the CFPB's 2025 decision to withdraw its 2022 guidance (Bulletin 2022-06) that warned banks against charging customers unfair fees when a deposited check bounces and is returned. By disapproving the CFPB's withdrawal, Congress would restore the 2022 bulletin's force, meaning banks would again face regulatory pressure not to charge customers these 'returned deposited item' fees. Ordinary bank customers — particularly those who deposit checks that later bounce — are the primary beneficiaries.

Why we flagged it

The resolution's functional effect is to restore CFPB guidance protecting consumers from a specific category of bank fee, making it a consumer financial protection measure rather than a procedural or deregulatory instrument.

What the text implies

  • Bulletin 2022-06 was guidance, not a binding rule — its restoration may not carry the same legal enforcement weight as a formal regulation, leaving the practical consumer protection dependent on how aggressively the CFPB chooses to act on it.
  • Banks that eliminated or reduced returned deposited item fees after the 2022 bulletin may face renewed compliance scrutiny, potentially prompting fee restructuring rather than elimination.
  • If enacted, this resolution would bar the CFPB from reissuing the same withdrawal rule, but the agency could potentially pursue a new rulemaking to achieve a similar deregulatory outcome through a different procedural path.

Section numbers refer to the bill text the analysis read — linked under Primary records below.

Who it affects

Restoring Bulletin 2022-06 reinstates regulatory guidance that discouraged banks from charging customers fees when a deposited check bounces through no fault of the depositor, directly protecting ordinary bank customers — often lower-income individuals — from unexpected penalty fees.

Who stands to gain

  • bank customers who deposit checks that are later returned
  • low- and moderate-income consumers disproportionately subject to returned item fees

Named in the bill

Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection (CFPB), Senate Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs, Senator Ben Ray Luján, Bulletin 2022-06

Where it stands

  • Mar 26, 2026 — Introduced · Congress.gov: “Introduced in Senate”
  • Mar 26, 2026 — Referred to Senate Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs · Congress.gov: “Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs”

Dates and quoted wording are Congress.gov's action record; the timeline shows status changes, not every procedural step.

How this was measured

Analysis — Quorum's AI read the bill text published by Congress.gov (1,350 characters) on Apr 3, 2026. Section numbers in the findings refer to that text, linked below; transparency and hidden-provision scores are compared against the median of 16,222 analysed bills.

Status and sponsors — Congress.gov's bill record — actions, committee referrals and cosponsors — loaded nightly. The timeline shows status changes, not every procedural action.

As of — page rendered 2026-10-20.

“Congress moves to restore bank fee protections the CFPB quietly dropped” QuorumCivic. https://share.quorumcivic.app/bill/119/sjres153 Report an error

Correlative observation from public records — not evidence of coordination or wrongdoing, and not financial advice.
This page is the record as of today. The app tells you when it changes.
Quorum analysis of the full bill text · 119th Congress · public record

The week in bills

One email, Sunday: what Congress passed, what it changed, and who paid.

One link arrives to confirm the address. It is used for this email and nothing else, and every issue carries an unsubscribe link.