Congress expands immigration enforcement, restricts protest, defunds sanctuary cities
S. 3790 — Protect America Act · Filed by Eric Schmitt (R-MO) · 1 cosponsor · Introduced Feb 5, 2026 · Referred to committee
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill creates four separate enforcement mechanisms: (1) it bars student visas to institutions in 'sanctuary jurisdictions' that limit immigration enforcement cooperation, and withholds federal funds from such jurisdictions unless they comply; (2) it increases criminal penalties for illegal entry (1–5 years for first offense, 2–10 years for repeat) and illegal reentry (5–10 years baseline, 10–20 years for those with prior criminal convictions or multiple removals), with mandatory detention and no bail pending trial; (3) it makes it a federal crime to create loud noise that interferes with federal officers' work, and increases assault penalties on federal officers (up to 40 years imprisonment); and (4) it strips tax-exempt status from nonprofits that 'promote, incite, or provide material support for criminal violence.' The bill benefits federal immigration enforcement and law enforcement agencies by expanding their legal tools and penalties; it imposes costs on sanctuary jurisdictions, immigrants facing reentry, and organizations deemed to support criminal violence.
Why we flagged it
The bill's core function is to expand federal immigration enforcement authority, increase criminal penalties, and restrict nonprofit speech. While framed as public safety, the operative mechanisms are enforcement expansion and speech/funding restrictions on organizations and jurisdictions.
- Section 302 (loud noise interference with federal officers) is substantively unrelated to immigration enforcement or criminal reentry penalties; it appears to target protest/demonstration conduct.
- Section 401 (nonprofit tax-exempt status revocation for 'criminal violence' support) is unrelated to immigration or law enforcement assault penalties; it targets nonprofit speech and funding.
What the text implies
- The 'sanctuary jurisdiction' definition is broad and subjective ('otherwise impeding communication'), allowing DHS to unilaterally designate jurisdictions and trigger visa/funding cutoffs without clear statutory boundaries, creating leverage over local law enforcement policy.
- Mandatory detention without bail for immigration offenses removes judicial discretion and may violate due-process norms; combined with 1–5 year minimum sentences for first-time entry, it creates severe consequences for civil immigration violations.
The full analysis lists 5 implications of this text.
Who stands to gain
federal law enforcement agencies (expanded enforcement authority and resources); private prison operators (increased incarceration for immigration offenses); detention facility contractors