QuorumCivic. Hidden in plain sight Get the app
Bill intelligence

Congress moves to strip California's power to set vehicle emissions rules

S.J.Res. 206 — A joint resolution providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Environmental Protection Agency relating to "California State Motor Vehicle Pollution Control Standards; Notice of Decision Granting a Waiver of Clean Air Act Preemption for California's 2009 and Subsequent Model Year Greenhouse Gas Emission Standards for New Motor Vehicles". · Filed by Eric Schmitt (R-MO) · 8 cosponsors · Introduced Aug 5, 2026 · Referred to committee

95%
Transparency
Typical bill: 82%
15/100
Hidden-provision risk
Typical bill: 15/100
Environmental Deregulation via CRA

Your members of Congress

Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.

Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.

What it does

This resolution disapproves an EPA decision from 2009 that allowed California to set its own vehicle greenhouse gas emission standards stricter than federal rules. If passed, it would nullify that EPA waiver, preventing California from enforcing tougher emissions standards on new vehicles and reverting to federal baseline rules.

Why we flagged it

This is a Congressional Review Act (CRA) disapproval resolution targeting a specific EPA environmental rule. Its operative effect is to eliminate a state's authority to enforce stricter vehicle emissions standards, functionally deregulating vehicle greenhouse gas emissions at the state level.

What the text implies

  • Nullifying the 2009 waiver does not merely revert to 2009 federal standards; it removes California's ongoing authority to update its standards for 2009 and subsequent model years, locking in federal baseline for all future vehicles unless Congress acts.
  • Other states that have adopted California's emission standards under Clean Air Act Section 209 would lose the ability to enforce those standards, as they depend on California's waiver to set standards stricter than federal rules.

The full analysis lists 3 implications of this text.

Who stands to gain

automotive manufacturers; fossil fuel producers

Correlative observation from public records — not evidence of coordination or wrongdoing, and not financial advice.
This page is the record as of today. The app tells you when it changes.
Quorum analysis of the full bill text · 119th Congress · public record