QuorumCivic. Hidden in plain sight Get the app
Bill intelligence

Congress funds $500M agricultural research push on climate and resilience

S. 3637 — ACE Agriculture Act of 2026 · Filed by Roger Marshall (R-KS) · 2 cosponsors · Introduced Jan 14, 2026 · Referred to committee

35%
Transparency
Typical bill: 82%
25/100
Hidden-provision risk
Typical bill: 15/100
Agricultural Research Funding

Your members of Congress

Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.

Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.

What it does

This bill amends the 1977 National Agricultural Research, Extension, and Teaching Policy Act to establish or expand the Agriculture Advanced Research and Development Authority (AGARDA), a research program within the USDA focused on developing cutting-edge agricultural technologies. The bill directs AGARDA to pursue long-term, high-risk research in areas including water conservation, greenhouse gas reduction, and resilience to climate impacts, disease, and pests. It authorizes $100 million annually from 2027–2031, allows the program to redirect unobligated USDA funds to its work, and clarifies reporting structures and staffing authority.

Why we flagged it

The bill's core function is to authorize and fund a USDA research authority focused on advanced agricultural technologies. Despite the fragmented legislative text, the substantive purpose is straightforward: establishing a research program with dedicated funding and governance structure.

What the text implies

  • The bill permits AGARDA to use 'other unobligated funds available to Sec. for any other purpose,' which may allow the program to redirect USDA resources from other agricultural initiatives without explicit appropriation, potentially reducing funding for extension services, conservation programs, or commodity support.
  • Greenhouse gas reduction and climate resilience research may indirectly influence agricultural practices and land-use policy, affecting commodity producers and agricultural input suppliers differently depending on which technologies are prioritized.

The full analysis lists 3 implications of this text.

Who stands to gain

agricultural biotechnology companies; agricultural equipment manufacturers; water technology vendors

Correlative observation from public records — not evidence of coordination or wrongdoing, and not financial advice.
This page is the record as of today. The app tells you when it changes.
Quorum analysis of the full bill text · 119th Congress · public record