QuorumCivic. Hidden in plain sight Get the app
Bill intelligence

New federal crime: trespassing on intelligence property carries up to 10 years.

S. 2425 — Intelligence Community Property Security Act of 2025 · Filed by Mike Rounds (R-SD) · 4 cosponsors · Introduced Jul 24, 2025 · Referred to committee

85%
Transparency
Typical bill: 82%
15/100
Hidden-provision risk
Typical bill: 15/100
Criminal Trespass Statute

Your members of Congress

Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.

Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.

What it does

This bill makes it a federal crime to enter or access intelligence community property without permission when it is clearly marked as closed or restricted. First-time offenders face up to 180 days in jail and/or fines; repeat offenders face progressively longer sentences up to 10 years for a third or subsequent offense.

Why we flagged it

The bill's sole operative mechanism is the creation of a new federal crime for unauthorized access to marked intelligence community property, with graduated penalties. It is a straightforward security measure, not a regulatory or appropriations instrument.

What the text implies

  • The statute's enforceability depends on how IC elements mark property as 'closed or restricted' — inconsistent or unclear marking could create disputes over whether entry was truly unauthorized, potentially leading to prosecutions of individuals who reasonably believed access was permitted.
  • Escalating penalties (10 years for third offense) may be disproportionate to the underlying harm of trespass, especially if applied to whistleblowers, journalists, or researchers who access IC property in good faith or for protected speech purposes.

The full analysis lists 3 implications of this text.

Who it affects

The bill protects legitimate government security interests by criminalizing trespass on sensitive facilities, which is a reasonable public-safety measure. However, the statute's scope depends entirely on what "clearly marked as closed or restricted" means in practice — vague boundary marking or overly broad IC claims could criminalize innocent entry or whistleblowing access, and the escalating penalties (10 years for a third offense) are severe for what may be a technical trespass.

Correlative observation from public records — not evidence of coordination or wrongdoing, and not financial advice.
This page is the record as of today. The app tells you when it changes.
Quorum analysis of the full bill text · 119th Congress · public record