Congress quietly expands foreign investment screening near U.S. military sites
S. 2116 — A bill to require the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States to annually review, update, and report on the facilities and property of the United States Government determined to be national security sensitive for purposes of review of real estate transactions under section 721 of the Defense Production Act of 1950. · Filed by Tim Scott (R-SC) · 11 cosponsors · Introduced Jun 18, 2025 · Referred to committee
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill requires the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS) to maintain and annually update a classified list of U.S. government facilities and properties that are sensitive for national security reasons. Each federal agency must review its facilities on the list annually and report recommended updates to CFIUS, and individual members of Congress can request classified briefings about the list. The goal is to ensure that foreign investment in real estate near critical U.S. infrastructure is properly screened and monitored.
Why we flagged it
The bill establishes a mandatory annual review and reporting mechanism for U.S. government facilities deemed sensitive for national security purposes under CFIUS jurisdiction. It creates procedural requirements for interagency coordination and congressional transparency regarding real estate transactions affecting critical infrastructure.
What the text implies
- Codifying a classified list of sensitive U.S. government facilities may inadvertently create a centralized inventory that, if breached, could expose critical infrastructure locations to foreign intelligence.
- Annual review requirements may slow CFIUS transaction approvals for real estate deals near sensitive sites, potentially affecting commercial real estate markets and foreign direct investment timelines.
The full analysis lists 4 implications of this text.
Who stands to gain
Commercial real estate firms (CBRE, PLD) — increased regulatory clarity may reduce transaction uncer; Real estate investment trusts — potential for more predictable CFIUS review timelines; Foreign investment advisory firms — demand for expertise navigating expanded national security scree