Forest Service boundary disputes now mediated by farmer-majority committees
S. 1636 — Fence Line Fairness Act of 2025 · Filed by Mike Rounds (R-SD) · Introduced May 7, 2025 · Referred to committee
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill requires the Secretary of Agriculture to establish state-level mediation committees composed mostly of farmers and ranchers to help resolve boundary disputes between private landowners and the National Forest Service. When a boundary dispute arises, the Forest Service must notify the private landowner within 30 days and offer mediation; if accepted, the committee holds hearings and submits non-binding recommendations to both parties and Congress within 180 days.
Why we flagged it
The bill's core function is procedural—it establishes a mediation framework for boundary disputes between private landowners and the Forest Service. It does not change substantive property law or transfer land; it creates a structured advisory process with defined timelines and reporting requirements.
What the text implies
- Mediation committees are majority-controlled by state-appointed farmers/ranchers (3 of 5 members), creating structural bias toward private landowner interests in disputes over federal forest boundaries.
- The bill requires Forest Service to notify private landowners of disputes within 30 days and offer mediation, but does not require the same transparency or notification to environmental groups, conservation interests, or the public.
The full analysis lists 4 implications of this text.
Who stands to gain
agricultural landowners and ranching operations; private land development interests adjacent to National Forest System land