Federal government returns Wounded Knee massacre site to tribal control
S. 105 — Wounded Knee Massacre Memorial and Sacred Site Act · Filed by Mike Rounds (R-SD) · 1 cosponsor · Introduced Jan 15, 2025 · Reported out
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill directs the Secretary of the Interior to transfer approximately 40 acres at Wounded Knee, South Dakota—the site of the 1890 massacre—into restricted fee status held by the Oglala Sioux Tribe and Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe. The land will remain tribal property, exempt from state taxation and outside state jurisdiction, and can be used only for purposes specified in a 2022 covenant between the two tribes (which excludes gaming). The Secretary has one year to complete the transfer and handle utility agreements.
Why we flagged it
The bill's core function is to transfer land title and sovereignty to tribal governments for a specific historical and sacred purpose, restoring tribal control over a massacre site. This is a straightforward exercise of federal trust responsibility and tribal self-determination, not a market-oriented or commemorative measure.
What the text implies
- The bill's reference to a 2022 covenant between the two tribes as the governing document for land use means the actual permitted uses are not fully transparent in the statute itself—they depend on an external agreement not reproduced in the bill text.
- The preservation of existing utility easements and service agreements may create ongoing administrative complexity and potential disputes over maintenance, access, and modernization of utilities crossing tribal land.
The full analysis lists 3 implications of this text.
Who it affects
This bill restores tribal sovereignty and control over a sacred historical site to the tribes most directly harmed by the 1890 massacre, removing it from potential state interference and enabling tribal self-determination. The restriction on gaming and preservation of existing utility agreements protect both tribal autonomy and legitimate third-party interests.