QuorumCivic. Hidden in plain sight Get the app
Bill intelligence

Congress blocks U.S. gas exports through Mexico, citing corruption—but at what cost?

S. 1035 — A bill to prohibit certain exports of natural gas produced or refined in the United States, and for other purposes. · Filed by Dan Sullivan (R-AK) · Introduced Mar 13, 2025 · Referred to committee

65%
Transparency
Typical bill: 82%
35/100
Hidden-provision risk
Typical bill: 15/100
High concernEnergy Export Restriction / Trade…

Your members of Congress

Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.

Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.

What it does

This bill prohibits U.S. natural gas from being exported to foreign countries (specifically Mexico) with the intent of being re-exported through foreign liquefied natural gas (LNG) terminals. The stated rationale is that Mexico's corruption, judicial politicization, and alleged violations of trade agreements make it a national security and economic risk to allow U.S. gas to transit through Mexican facilities.

Why we flagged it

The bill's core mechanism is a blanket prohibition on re-exporting U.S. natural gas through foreign LNG terminals, framed as a national security and anti-corruption measure but functionally restricting market access for U.S. producers and potentially favoring domestic LNG export infrastructure.

What the text implies

  • By blocking re-export through Mexico, the bill may force U.S. producers to use only domestic LNG export terminals, concentrating market power and potentially raising export costs for producers and domestic consumers.
  • The bill's findings extensively document Mexican corruption and judicial politicization but do not explicitly define what constitutes 'intent to further export'—creating ambiguity in enforcement and potential for selective application.

The full analysis lists 4 implications of this text.

Who stands to gain

U.S. domestic LNG export terminal operators; U.S. natural gas producers with domestic export capacity; Companies with competing LNG infrastructure (e.g., Cheniere Energy, if not mapped)

Correlative observation from public records — not evidence of coordination or wrongdoing, and not financial advice.
This page is the record as of today. The app tells you when it changes.
Quorum analysis of the full bill text · 119th Congress · public record