QuorumCivic. Hidden in plain sight Get the app
Bill intelligence

Nevada land deal locks in water extraction, tribal limits, and development zones

S. 1005 — Southern Nevada Economic Development and Conservation Act · Filed by Catherine Cortez Masto (D-NV) · Introduced Mar 12, 2025 · Hearing held

55%
Transparency
Typical bill: 82%
35/100
Hidden-provision risk
Typical bill: 15/100
2
Unrelated riders
No connection to the stated subject
High concernLand Management and Development Compromise

Your members of Congress

Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.

Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.

What it does

This bill transfers approximately 244,000 acres of federal land in southern Nevada to Native American tribes, local governments, and conservation areas. It creates new wilderness designations, establishes off-highway vehicle recreation areas, allows water infrastructure development, and permits limited development in specific zones—all while restricting gaming on tribal lands and protecting endangered species habitat.

Why we flagged it

The bill is fundamentally a land-use settlement balancing tribal sovereignty, conservation, local development, and water infrastructure. It is neither purely protective nor purely extractive, but rather a negotiated allocation of federal land with multiple competing interests embedded throughout.

  • Section 206 designates Frenchman Mountain peak as 'Maude Frazier Mountain'—unrelated to the bill's core land-management purpose.
  • Section 208 amends Nevada Cancer Institute land conveyance language (successor-in-interest clause)—substantively unrelated to southern Nevada land transfers.

What the text implies

  • The bill grants Southern Nevada Water Authority permanent and temporary rights-of-way for water pipeline infrastructure without rent or charges, potentially locking in water extraction from conservation areas for decades.
  • Tribal lands are explicitly prohibited from gaming (class II and III), limiting a major revenue source for tribal economic development compared to other tribes nationally.

The full analysis lists 5 implications of this text.

Who stands to gain

Southern Nevada Water Authority; Clark County (land development and public safety infrastructure); Las Vegas Paiute Tribe and other tribal entities

Correlative observation from public records — not evidence of coordination or wrongdoing, and not financial advice.
This page is the record as of today. The app tells you when it changes.
Quorum analysis of the full bill text · 119th Congress · public record