QuorumCivic. Hidden in plain sight Get the app
Bill intelligence

Federal wildfire response gets major upgrade: new teams, $100M recovery fund, drone rules

S. 91 — Western Wildfire Support Act of 2025 · Filed by Catherine Cortez Masto (D-NV) · 1 cosponsor · Introduced Jan 14, 2025 · Reported out

72%
Transparency
Typical bill: 82%
15/100
Hidden-provision risk
Typical bill: 15/100
Wildfire Response and Post-Fire Recovery…

Your members of Congress

Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.

Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.

What it does

This bill creates a coordinated federal response to wildfires and post-fire recovery. It requires the Interior Department to track federal funding for fire-suppression equipment (slip-on tanker units), directs research into drone and unmanned aircraft for wildfire response, studies how private drones interfere with firefighting, modernizes wildfire communications and prediction tools, funds state-run websites to help disaster survivors access recovery assistance, establishes permanent federal Burned Area Emergency Response Teams, creates a $100M annual fund for long-term forest recovery after fires, and establishes a prize competition for wildfire-invasive species management technology.

Why we flagged it

The bill's core function is to expand federal wildfire suppression capacity, improve post-disaster recovery coordination, and fund ecosystem restoration. The named prize competition (Theodore Roosevelt Genius Prize) is a secondary provision honoring a historical figure, not a sitting officeholder, and does not dominate the bill's substance.

What the text implies

  • The $100M Long-Term Burned Area Rehabilitation account is open-ended and permanent (authorized annually thereafter), creating a sustained federal commitment to post-fire recovery that may grow significantly over time.
  • The bill authorizes the Secretary of Agriculture to enter cost-share agreements with non-Federal entities (states, tribes, private conservation groups) for ecosystem restoration, potentially creating a new funding stream for private land recovery if the non-Federal share is met.

The full analysis lists 4 implications of this text.

Who stands to gain

state and local fire departments (equipment funding); universities and research institutions (R&D contracts); conservation organizations and non-Federal entities (cost-share agreements for restoration)

Correlative observation from public records — not evidence of coordination or wrongdoing, and not financial advice.
This page is the record as of today. The app tells you when it changes.
Quorum analysis of the full bill text · 119th Congress · public record