Congress backs pregnant woman's right to refuse life support
H.Res. 522 — Recognizing that Adriana Smith and her family's prolonged ordeal without their consent is the direct result of the Black maternal health crisis, the danger of laws that give rights to fetuses and take them away from pregnant people, and anti-abortion laws that continue to harm people who can become pregnant. · Filed by Nikema Williams (D-GA) · 2 cosponsors · Introduced Jun 17, 2025 · Referred to committee
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This is a House resolution expressing support for Adriana Smith, a pregnant woman declared brain dead in Georgia whose body is being kept on life support against her family's wishes due to state abortion restrictions. The resolution condemns fetal-personhood laws and state restrictions on advance directives for pregnant people, and calls on states to repeal abortion bans and clarify how such laws interact with end-of-life medical decisions.
Why we flagged it
This is a non-binding House resolution expressing the chamber's position on abortion restrictions, fetal-personhood laws, and their interaction with end-of-life medical decisions. It does not create law or appropriate funds; it is a statement of congressional sentiment tied to a specific case.
What the text implies
- The resolution's focus on advance directives and life-support decisions may signal congressional intent to challenge state laws that restrict pregnant people's end-of-life autonomy, potentially creating legal pressure on states to revise existing statutes.
- By naming Georgia's LIFE Act and highlighting the chilling effect on medical care, the resolution may encourage litigation challenging the constitutionality of fetal-personhood laws under due-process and bodily-autonomy grounds.
- The emphasis on Black maternal mortality disparities and medical racism frames abortion restrictions as a civil-rights issue, potentially broadening the legislative coalition beyond traditional reproductive-rights advocates.
Who it affects
The resolution advocates for pregnant people's bodily autonomy, medical decision-making rights, and protection from state-mandated life support that overrides family wishes. It highlights systemic barriers to Black maternal health and calls for legal clarity that prioritizes patient autonomy over fetal rights—protections that would benefit pregnant people and their families.
Named in the bill
Adriana Smith, Northside Hospital (Atlanta), Emory University Midtown Hospital, Georgia LIFE Act, Georgia Attorney General Chris Carr, Patient Self-Determination Act of 1990, House Committee on the Judiciary, House Committee on Energy and Commerce
Where it stands
2 cosponsors: 2 Democrats.
- Jun 17, 2025 — Referred to House Committee on the Judiciary and House Committee on Energy and Commerce · Congress.gov: “Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on the Judiciary, for a…”
Dates and quoted wording are Congress.gov's action record; the timeline shows status changes, not every procedural step.
How this was measured
Analysis — Quorum's AI read the full bill text on Jul 6, 2026; transparency and hidden-provision scores are compared against the median of 16,222 analysed bills.
Status and sponsors — Congress.gov's bill record — actions, committee referrals and cosponsors — loaded nightly. The timeline shows status changes, not every procedural action.
As of — page rendered 2026-10-20.
“Congress backs pregnant woman's right to refuse life support” QuorumCivic. https://share.quorumcivic.app/bill/119/hres522 Report an error
The week in bills
One email, Sunday: what Congress passed, what it changed, and who paid.
One link arrives to confirm the address. It is used for this email and nothing else, and every issue carries an unsubscribe link.