QuorumCivic. Hidden in plain sight Get the app
Bill intelligence

Congress expands firearm ban for domestic abusers, funds enforcement.

H.R. 9983 — Lori Jackson-Nicolette Elias Domestic Violence Survivor Protection Act · Filed by Jim Himes (D-CT) · 18 cosponsors · Introduced Jul 30, 2026 · Referred to committee

85%
Transparency
Typical bill: 82%
8/100
Hidden-provision risk
Typical bill: 15/100
Domestic Violence Firearm Restriction

Your members of Congress

Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.

Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.

What it does

This bill closes federal loopholes that allow domestic violence abusers to keep firearms even after a court issues a protective order against them. It expands the definition of 'intimate partner' to include dating partners (not just spouses and cohabitants), requires abusers subject to domestic violence court orders—including emergency/temporary ones—to surrender all firearms within 24 hours, and creates a federal grant program to help states and local law enforcement enforce firearm removal and safe storage.

Why we flagged it

The bill's operative mechanism is straightforward: it expands who counts as a protected intimate partner under federal firearm-prohibition law, mandates firearm surrender during protective orders, and funds enforcement. The title accurately describes the function.

What the text implies

  • Emergency/ex parte protective orders now trigger firearm surrender obligations immediately, even before a full hearing—this shifts the burden to the abuser to prove compliance rather than the victim to prove danger, potentially accelerating enforcement but also raising due-process questions if the order is later vacated.
  • The 24-hour surrender deadline is strict and applies to firearms the abuser has 'entrusted or lent to a third party'—enforcement may require law enforcement to locate and retrieve firearms from third parties who have no notice of the order, creating practical compliance and privacy friction.

The full analysis lists 4 implications of this text.

Who stands to gain

law enforcement agencies (grant funding for firearm storage and removal operations); domestic violence victim service organizations (grant-funded partnerships); federally licensed firearms dealers (authorized to store surrendered firearms)

Correlative observation from public records — not evidence of coordination or wrongdoing, and not financial advice.
This page is the record as of today. The app tells you when it changes.
Quorum analysis of the full bill text · 119th Congress · public record