Federal law shields remote workers from multistate income taxes
H.R. 10142 — Multi-State Worker Tax Fairness Act of 2026 · Filed by Jim Himes (D-CT) · 2 cosponsors · Introduced Aug 24, 2026 · Referred to committee
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill prohibits states from taxing the income of nonresident workers (including remote workers) unless those workers are physically present in the state. It bars states from deeming someone to be 'working' in their state based on home-office convenience tests or employer policies, and requires that compensation be allocated only to periods when the worker is physically present in the taxing state. The bill benefits remote workers and multistate employees by preventing states from claiming tax jurisdiction over their wages when they work from home in another state.
Why we flagged it
The bill's core function is to restrict state taxing authority over nonresident workers' compensation by tying tax jurisdiction to physical presence. It is a federalism measure that preempts state income-tax doctrine, not a tax cut or subsidy—it reallocates taxing power away from states.
What the text implies
- States that currently rely on convenience-of-employer doctrine to tax remote workers' income will lose a revenue source; the fiscal impact on state budgets is not quantified in the bill.
- The bill's definition of 'physical presence' may create disputes over what constitutes presence (e.g., brief visits, layovers, partial days) and could generate litigation over boundary cases.
- Employers gain indirect benefit: they will no longer face multistate tax compliance burdens for remote workers, reducing their administrative costs and potential liability for withholding in multiple states.
- The bill does not address federal income tax treatment or interstate commerce clause implications; its interaction with existing federal tax law and dormant commerce clause doctrine is unclear from the text alone.
Section numbers refer to the bill text the analysis read — linked under Primary records below.
Who it affects
Remote and multistate workers gain direct financial relief by being shielded from state income taxation on wages earned while physically present in other states. The restriction on state taxing authority is a restraint on government power to collect taxes from citizens, which increases take-home pay for affected workers.
Who stands to gain
- remote workers and multistate employees (reduced state tax liability)
- employers with remote workforces (reduced multistate tax compliance and withholding obligations)
Named in the bill
States and territories, District of Columbia, nonresident individuals, employers, 4 U.S.C. Chapter 4, section 110(c)
Where it stands
2 cosponsors: 2 Democrats.
- Aug 24, 2026 — Introduced · Congress.gov: “Introduced in House”
- Aug 24, 2026 — Referred to House Committee on the Judiciary · Congress.gov: “Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary”
Dates and quoted wording are Congress.gov's action record; the timeline shows status changes, not every procedural step.
How this was measured
Analysis — Quorum's AI read the bill text published by Congress.gov (4,161 characters) on Aug 29, 2026. Section numbers in the findings refer to that text, linked below; transparency and hidden-provision scores are compared against the median of 16,222 analysed bills.
Status and sponsors — Congress.gov's bill record — actions, committee referrals and cosponsors — loaded nightly. The timeline shows status changes, not every procedural action.
As of — page rendered 2026-10-20.
“Federal law shields remote workers from multistate income taxes” QuorumCivic. https://share.quorumcivic.app/bill/119/hr10142 Report an error
The week in bills
One email, Sunday: what Congress passed, what it changed, and who paid.
One link arrives to confirm the address. It is used for this email and nothing else, and every issue carries an unsubscribe link.