QuorumCivic. Hidden in plain sight Get the app
Bill intelligence

Congress mandates auto insurance study—but no actual cost relief

H.R. 9916 — Lowering CAR Insurance Act · Filed by Susie Lee (D-NV) · Introduced Jul 23, 2026 · Referred to committee

85%
Transparency
Typical bill: 82%
15/100
Hidden-provision risk
Typical bill: 15/100
Transparency and Reporting Mandate

Your members of Congress

Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.

Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.

What it does

This bill requires the Federal Insurance Office (a Treasury agency) to submit an annual report by September 30 each year to the President and two congressional committees analyzing the automobile insurance industry and recommending legislative changes to lower insurance costs. The report must also include any other auto-insurance information the Director deems relevant or the committees request. The requirement takes effect 90 days after enactment.

Why we flagged it

The bill's sole operative mechanism is a new annual reporting requirement on the Federal Insurance Office. It does not regulate insurance rates, restrict industry practices, or mandate consumer protections—it mandates data collection and legislative recommendations to inform future policy.

What the text implies

  • The bill does not define what 'lowering the cost' means or bind the Director to any particular methodology, leaving room for industry-friendly or consumer-protective interpretations depending on who leads the Federal Insurance Office.
  • The phrase 'any other information as deemed relevant by the Director' gives the Director broad discretion to include or exclude data, potentially allowing selective framing of the auto-insurance market.

The full analysis lists 4 implications of this text.

Who it affects

The bill creates transparency and information-gathering infrastructure that could support future consumer-protective legislation, but it imposes no direct cost controls, rate caps, or consumer protections itself. The actual benefit to citizens depends entirely on whether Congress acts on the Director's recommendations—the bill is a procedural prerequisite, not a substantive reform.

Correlative observation from public records — not evidence of coordination or wrongdoing, and not financial advice.
This page is the record as of today. The app tells you when it changes.
Quorum analysis of the full bill text · 119th Congress · public record