QuorumCivic. Hidden in plain sight Get the app
Bill intelligence

Food delivery platforms must get restaurant permission—but details matter

H.R. 10885 — To ensure delivery service providers have partnership agreements with the restaurants for which the providers deliver, and for other purposes. · Filed by Susie Lee (D-NV) · 5 cosponsors · Introduced Oct 22, 2026 · Referred to committee

30%
Transparency
Typical bill: 85%
15/100
Hidden-provision risk
Typical bill: 15/100
Food Delivery Platform Regulation

Your members of Congress

Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.

Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.

What it does

This bill would require food delivery companies (like DoorDash, Uber Eats, Grubhub) to have written partnership agreements with restaurants before delivering their food. The stated purpose is to ensure restaurants consent to being listed on delivery platforms and to establish clear terms between the parties.

Why we flagged it

The bill's core mechanism is a contractual-consent requirement for delivery platforms, positioning it as a regulatory measure governing third-party marketplace conduct rather than a consumer protection or restaurant subsidy bill.

What the text implies

  • If the bill does not specify fee caps or transparency requirements, platforms may comply by requiring restaurants to accept unfavorable terms in exchange for listing—shifting the burden rather than solving it.
  • Restaurants may face increased compliance costs (legal review, negotiation) that could be passed to consumers via higher menu prices or delivery fees.
  • The bill's scope on 'partnership agreements' is undefined: does it cover commission rates, data access, menu control, or only consent to listing? Ambiguity may invite litigation or regulatory interpretation.
  • Small restaurants with limited negotiating power may still face take-it-or-leave-it terms from dominant platforms, rendering the requirement nominal.

Who it affects

Requiring partnership agreements protects restaurants from unauthorized listing and predatory terms, which may stabilize local food service and reduce hidden fees passed to consumers. However, the bill's actual scope, enforcement mechanism, and whether it caps delivery fees or protects consumer pricing remain unknown from metadata alone—implementation details will determine whether consumers benefit or face higher delivery costs.

Who stands to gain

  • restaurants (if the bill grants meaningful negotiating leverage)
  • potentially delivery platforms (if compliance costs are minimal and the requirement legitimizes thei

Named in the bill

delivery service providers, restaurants, House Committee on Energy and Commerce, DoorDash, Uber Eats, Grubhub

Where it stands

5 cosponsors: 3 Democrats, 2 Republicans.

  • Oct 22, 2026 — Introduced · Congress.gov: “Introduced in House”
  • Oct 22, 2026 — Referred to House Committee on Energy and Commerce · Congress.gov: “Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce”

Dates and quoted wording are Congress.gov's action record; the timeline shows status changes, not every procedural step.

How this was measured

Analysis — Quorum's AI read the full bill text on Oct 26, 2026; transparency and hidden-provision scores are compared against the median of 16,580 analysed bills.

Status and sponsors — Congress.gov's bill record — actions, committee referrals and cosponsors — loaded nightly. The timeline shows status changes, not every procedural action.

As of — page rendered 2026-10-26.

“Food delivery platforms must get restaurant permission—but details matter” QuorumCivic. https://share.quorumcivic.app/bill/119/hr10885 Report an error

Correlative observation from public records — not evidence of coordination or wrongdoing, and not financial advice.
This page is the record as of today. The app tells you when it changes.
Quorum analysis of the full bill text · 119th Congress · public record

The week in bills

One email, Sunday: what Congress passed, what it changed, and who paid.

One link arrives to confirm the address. It is used for this email and nothing else, and every issue carries an unsubscribe link.