Congress moves to restore voting rights for millions with criminal convictions
H.R. 9873 — Inclusive Democracy Act of 2026 · Filed by Ayanna Pressley (D-MA) · 13 cosponsors · Introduced Jul 22, 2026 · Referred to committee
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill guarantees that people convicted of criminal offenses retain the right to vote in federal elections. It requires states and federal courts to notify convicted individuals of their voting rights, mandates that prisons and jails offer voter registration and absentee ballot access, and establishes enforcement mechanisms including a private right of action. The bill applies retroactively to all prior convictions and takes effect for the November 2026 election.
Why we flagged it
The bill's core mechanism is straightforward: it removes federal felony disenfranchisement for federal elections and creates affirmative access pathways (registration, absentee voting, information access) for incarcerated and formerly incarcerated voters. This is a direct voting-rights expansion, not a procedural or technical amendment.
What the text implies
- The bill's retroactive application (covering convictions before, on, or after enactment) may create a surge in voter registration among the estimated 5.2 million Americans with felony convictions currently ineligible to vote in some states, potentially shifting electoral demographics in states with high incarceration rates.
- Requiring carceral facilities to provide free internet access to incarcerated voters for candidate research and voting information may create operational and security compliance challenges for correctional institutions, particularly in facilities with limited IT infrastructure.
The full analysis lists 5 implications of this text.
Who it affects
The bill expands voting rights to a historically disenfranchised population (people with criminal convictions) by removing federal barriers and creating affirmative access mechanisms in carceral settings. It strengthens democratic participation and accountability without imposing costs on ordinary citizens; the administrative burden falls on election officials and correctional institutions, not the public.