QuorumCivic. Hidden in plain sight Get the app
Bill intelligence
Full Simple

Banks must cut fossil fuel financing by 2035 or lose deposit insurance

H.R. 10746 — Fossil Free Finance Act of 2026 · Filed by Ayanna Pressley (D-MA) · 1 cosponsor · Introduced Oct 5, 2026 · Referred to committee

72%
Transparency
Typical bill: 85%
18/100
Hidden-provision risk
Typical bill: 15/100
High concernClimate-Driven Financial Regulation

Your members of Congress

Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.

Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.

What it does

This bill requires large banks (those with $50+ billion in assets) to submit climate emission reduction plans to the Federal Reserve and phase out financing of fossil fuels and deforestation-linked commodities by 2035, reaching zero emissions by 2050. Banks must stop funding new fossil fuel projects within 60 days and thermal coal immediately. The Federal Reserve can reject plans that rely on carbon offsets, impose penalties including asset divestiture, and the FDIC can revoke deposit insurance for non-compliance.

Why we flagged it

The bill's core mechanism is a regulatory mandate requiring large banks to reduce financed emissions and divest from fossil fuels and deforestation-linked commodities. It is framed as financial stability policy but operates as climate policy by constraining capital flows to carbon-intensive industries.

What the text implies

  • The bill defines 'financial sector emissions' to include both direct financed emissions and facilitated emissions (underwriting, advisory), dramatically expanding the scope of bank liability and potentially capturing advisory services unrelated to direct capital provision.
  • The 60-day deadline to discontinue new or expanded fossil fuel projects is extremely tight and may force banks to unwind commitments already made, creating legal and contractual disputes.
  • The bill grants the Federal Reserve broad discretion to reject plans and require divestiture without explicit standards for what constitutes 'science-based targets,' creating regulatory uncertainty and potential for inconsistent enforcement.
  • Requiring banks to eliminate financing of 'deforestation risk commodities' globally may impose compliance costs that smaller regional banks cannot absorb, potentially consolidating banking power among the largest institutions.
  • The bill does not specify how banks should measure or attribute emissions to financed activities, creating data quality and methodological disputes that could paralyze compliance efforts.

Section numbers refer to the bill text the analysis read — linked under Primary records below.

Who it affects

The bill protects citizens from climate-driven financial instability and environmental harm by constraining bank funding of fossil fuels and deforestation, but imposes real transition costs on workers and communities dependent on fossil fuel industries. The bill includes worker retraining provisions and prioritizes lending to affected communities, but the scale and adequacy of those protections are uncertain.

Who stands to gain

  • renewable energy companies and project developers
  • climate technology and carbon capture firms
  • sustainable agriculture and forestry enterprises
  • worker retraining and severance service providers
  • environmental consulting and ESG advisory firms

Named in the bill

Federal Reserve Board, Bank Holding Company Act of 1956, Financial Stability Act of 2010, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC), covered bank holding companies (assets ≥$50B), nonbank financial companies supervised by the Board, fossil fuel companies and projects, deforestation-linked commodity producers

Where it stands

1 cosponsor: 1 Democrats.

  • Oct 5, 2026 — Introduced · Congress.gov: “Introduced in House”
  • Oct 5, 2026 — Referred to House Committee on Financial Services · Congress.gov: “Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services”

Dates and quoted wording are Congress.gov's action record; the timeline shows status changes, not every procedural step.

How this was measured

Analysis — Quorum's AI read the bill text published by Congress.gov (14,599 characters) on Oct 8, 2026. Section numbers in the findings refer to that text, linked below; transparency and hidden-provision scores are compared against the median of 16,222 analysed bills.

Status and sponsors — Congress.gov's bill record — actions, committee referrals and cosponsors — loaded nightly. The timeline shows status changes, not every procedural action.

As of — page rendered 2026-10-20.

“Banks must cut fossil fuel financing by 2035 or lose deposit insurance” QuorumCivic. https://share.quorumcivic.app/bill/119/hr10746 Report an error

Correlative observation from public records — not evidence of coordination or wrongdoing, and not financial advice.
This page is the record as of today. The app tells you when it changes.
Quorum analysis of the full bill text · 119th Congress · public record

The week in bills

One email, Sunday: what Congress passed, what it changed, and who paid.

One link arrives to confirm the address. It is used for this email and nothing else, and every issue carries an unsubscribe link.