QuorumCivic. Hidden in plain sight Get the app
Bill intelligence

Bill lets President fast-track pipelines, strip states of power, seize land

H.R. 9838 — National Security Interstate Pipeline Act · Filed by Ken Calvert (R-CA) · 7 cosponsors · Introduced Jul 22, 2026 · Referred to committee

35%
Transparency
Typical bill: 82%
68/100
Hidden-provision risk
Typical bill: 15/100
Critical concernPipeline Industry Deregulation & Eminent…

Your members of Congress

Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.

Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.

What it does

This bill allows the President to designate interstate oil and natural gas pipelines as 'national security' projects, which then receive expedited federal approval through FERC while bypassing state, local, and tribal permitting entirely. Once designated, the pipeline company gains the power to seize private land through eminent domain with minimal notice, federal environmental reviews are deemed automatically approved if not completed within 180 days, and the President can waive compliance with the Clean Air Act, Clean Water Act, and Endangered Species Act if he deems delay 'unacceptable.'

Why we flagged it

The bill's operative mechanism is not national security per se—it is a streamlined permitting and land-seizure regime for oil and gas pipelines, wrapped in national-security framing. The 'national security' designation is a presidential discretion trigger, not a limiting principle; the actual substance is deregulation (environmental law waivers, state preemption) and eminent-domain acceleration.

What the text implies

  • The 180-day federal review auto-approval and 60-day state/local auto-approval create a de facto approval-by-silence regime; agencies that lack resources to meet artificial deadlines will see their authority nullified without affirmative action.
  • The 'national security' designation is entirely within presidential discretion with no statutory limiting criteria—any interstate pipeline can be designated if the President determines it supports 'military installations, defense industrial base, or critical infrastructure resilience,' terms broad enough to encompass nearly any pipeline.

The full analysis lists 5 implications of this text.

Who stands to gain

oil and natural gas pipeline operators; energy infrastructure companies; construction and engineering firms serving pipeline projects

Correlative observation from public records — not evidence of coordination or wrongdoing, and not financial advice.
This page is the record as of today. The app tells you when it changes.
Quorum analysis of the full bill text · 119th Congress · public record