QuorumCivic. Hidden in plain sight Get the app
Bill intelligence

New federal office to coordinate climate adaptation across agencies

H.R. 9760 — National Coordination on Adaptation and Resilience for Security Act of 2026 · Filed by Scott Peters (D-CA) · 1 cosponsor · Introduced Jul 16, 2026 · Referred to committee

78%
Transparency
Typical bill: 82%
8/100
Hidden-provision risk
Typical bill: 15/100
Climate Adaptation Coordination Framework

Your members of Congress

Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.

Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.

What it does

This bill creates a new federal position—the Chief Resilience Officer—within the National Security Council to coordinate how the U.S. government prepares for and adapts to natural hazards (floods, wildfires, sea-level rise, drought, etc.) that threaten national security. The officer will establish interagency working groups, convene a 24-member council with state/local officials and private-sector representatives, and produce a National Resilience Strategy every 3 years. The bill requires federal agencies to streamline funding, reduce redundancy, and help communities—especially rural and underresourced ones—access federal adaptation resources. A public clearinghouse will centralize federal resilience data and technical assistance.

Why we flagged it

The bill's core function is establishing a federal coordination mechanism for climate and natural-hazard resilience, framed explicitly as a national security issue. It is procedural and administrative—creating a new office, working groups, and reporting requirements—rather than appropriating funds or imposing direct regulations.

What the text implies

  • The bill frames climate adaptation as a national security issue, potentially expanding DoD and intelligence-community involvement in climate policy beyond traditional environmental agencies.
  • The clearinghouse and standardized metrics may create new federal data infrastructure on community vulnerability that could have surveillance or targeting implications if misused.

The full analysis lists 4 implications of this text.

Who stands to gain

construction and infrastructure firms specializing in resilience/adaptation projects; consulting firms advising on climate adaptation and mitigation; technology companies providing climate modeling, data, and monitoring tools

Correlative observation from public records — not evidence of coordination or wrongdoing, and not financial advice.
This page is the record as of today. The app tells you when it changes.
Quorum analysis of the full bill text · 119th Congress · public record