Congress moves to free workers from noncompete chains
H.R. 10215 — Workforce Mobility Act of 2026 · Filed by Scott Peters (D-CA) · 1 cosponsor · Introduced Sep 1, 2026 · Referred to committee
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill prohibits employers from enforcing noncompete agreements that restrict workers from taking jobs elsewhere after leaving their employer. It creates narrow exceptions for business sales (where a buyer can restrict the seller from competing) and partnership dissolutions, but bans the practice for ordinary employees. The bill empowers the FTC and Department of Labor to enforce the ban, allows workers to sue employers directly, and requires employers to post notice of the law.
Why we flagged it
The bill's core mechanism is a straightforward prohibition on noncompete agreements for employees, with narrow carve-outs for business sales and partnerships. It is a labor-market deregulation in workers' favor—removing an employer restraint rather than imposing one.
What the text implies
- Noncompete bans may increase poaching of skilled workers by competitors, potentially accelerating talent concentration at well-capitalized firms and startups.
- Employers may shift to alternative restraint mechanisms (longer-term NDAs, stricter trade-secret claims, equity clawbacks) that are harder to police and may be less transparent to workers.
- The bill's exceptions for business sales and senior executives with severance agreements create a two-tier system: rank-and-file workers get full freedom, but executives in M&A contexts can still be restricted for up to one year.
- Enforcement depends on FTC and DOL capacity; underfunded agencies may struggle to investigate and prosecute violations, especially against large employers with sophisticated legal teams.
Section numbers refer to the bill text the analysis read — linked under Primary records below.
Who it affects
Workers gain freedom to change jobs and negotiate higher wages; the bill removes a widespread restraint on labor mobility that economists estimate affects 1 in 5 workers. Employers retain legitimate protections (trade secrets, NDAs, IP law) without the collateral harm of broad noncompetes.
Who stands to gain
- workers (wage growth, job mobility)
- startups and smaller competitors (reduced barriers to hiring talent)
- labor-intensive industries with high turnover (reduced hiring friction)
Named in the bill
Federal Trade Commission (FTC), Department of Labor (DOL), State Attorneys General, employers, employees, business entities (partnerships, LLCs, corporations)
Where it stands
1 cosponsor: 1 Republicans.
- Sep 1, 2026 — Introduced · Congress.gov: “Introduced in House”
- Sep 1, 2026 — Referred to House Committee on Education and Workforce and House Committee on Energy and Commerce · Congress.gov: “Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Education and…”
Dates and quoted wording are Congress.gov's action record; the timeline shows status changes, not every procedural step.
How this was measured
Analysis — Quorum's AI read the bill text published by Congress.gov (17,461 characters) on Sep 7, 2026. Section numbers in the findings refer to that text, linked below; transparency and hidden-provision scores are compared against the median of 16,413 analysed bills.
Status and sponsors — Congress.gov's bill record — actions, committee referrals and cosponsors — loaded nightly. The timeline shows status changes, not every procedural action.
As of — page rendered 2026-10-23.
“Congress moves to free workers from noncompete chains” QuorumCivic. https://share.quorumcivic.app/bill/119/hr10215 Report an error
The week in bills
One email, Sunday: what Congress passed, what it changed, and who paid.
One link arrives to confirm the address. It is used for this email and nothing else, and every issue carries an unsubscribe link.