QuorumCivic. Hidden in plain sight Get the app
Bill intelligence
Full Simple

Your insurance denial now requires a real doctor's signature

H.R. 9734 — Protecting Patients from Automated Denials Act · Filed by Herbert Conaway (D-NJ) · 2 cosponsors · Introduced Jul 16, 2026 · Referred to committee

82%
Transparency
Typical bill: 85%
15/100
Hidden-provision risk
Typical bill: 15/100
Patient Protection / Insurance Oversight

Your members of Congress

Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.

Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.

What it does

This bill requires Medicare Advantage insurance plans to have a licensed physician personally review and approve any prior authorization denial that was informed by artificial intelligence before the denial is issued. The physician must attest in writing that they exercised independent medical judgment and that the AI did not dictate the decision. Plans must disclose to patients and providers that AI was used, provide the physician's identifier, and maintain records for 10 years. The bill also requires plans to report to the Secretary of Health and Human Services every 90 days on AI-assisted denials and gives HHS authority to audit and inspect these practices.

Why we flagged it

The bill's operative mechanism is a regulatory requirement imposing human-review and transparency obligations on Medicare Advantage plans' use of AI in denial decisions. It is fundamentally a patient-protection and insurance-oversight measure, not a subsidy, carve-out, or deregulation.

What the text implies

  • Plans may respond by hiring more physician reviewers, increasing administrative costs that could be passed to enrollees through higher premiums or reduced benefits.
  • The 10-year record-retention requirement creates a detailed audit trail that could expose patterns of inappropriate denials, potentially triggering enforcement actions or litigation.
  • Requiring disclosure of the reviewing physician's NPI number may enable patients to identify patterns of denials by specific reviewers, creating accountability pressure on individual physicians.
  • The 90-day reporting requirement to HHS creates a new data stream that could reveal disparities in denial rates by geography, specialty, or patient demographics.

Section numbers refer to the bill text the analysis read — linked under Primary records below.

Who it affects

Ordinary patients and their doctors gain transparency, human oversight, and documented accountability in insurance denial decisions that directly affect their access to care. The requirement for independent physician review and attestation creates a meaningful check on automated denials that could otherwise block necessary treatment without human clinical judgment.

Named in the bill

Medicare Advantage organizations, Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), American Board of Medical Specialties, American Osteopathic Association, National Artificial Intelligence Initiative Act of 2020

Where it stands

2 cosponsors: 2 Republicans.

  • Jul 16, 2026 — Introduced · Congress.gov: “Introduced in House”
  • Jul 16, 2026 — Referred to House Committee on Energy and Commerce and House Committee on Ways and Means · Congress.gov: “Referred to the Committee on Ways and Means, and in addition to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, for a…”

Dates and quoted wording are Congress.gov's action record; the timeline shows status changes, not every procedural step.

How this was measured

Analysis — Quorum's AI read the bill text published by Congress.gov (5,276 characters) on Aug 12, 2026. Section numbers in the findings refer to that text, linked below; transparency and hidden-provision scores are compared against the median of 16,222 analysed bills.

Status and sponsors — Congress.gov's bill record — actions, committee referrals and cosponsors — loaded nightly. The timeline shows status changes, not every procedural action.

As of — page rendered 2026-10-20.

“Your insurance denial now requires a real doctor's signature” QuorumCivic. https://share.quorumcivic.app/bill/119/hr9734 Report an error

Correlative observation from public records — not evidence of coordination or wrongdoing, and not financial advice.
This page is the record as of today. The app tells you when it changes.
Quorum analysis of the full bill text · 119th Congress · public record

The week in bills

One email, Sunday: what Congress passed, what it changed, and who paid.

One link arrives to confirm the address. It is used for this email and nothing else, and every issue carries an unsubscribe link.