Congress tightens judicial gift rules, creating new enforcement teeth
H.R. 9688 — High Court Gift Ban Act · Filed by Jamie Raskin (D-MD) · 41 cosponsors · Introduced Jul 14, 2026 · Referred to committee
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill prohibits federal judges from accepting gifts valued over $50 from a single source or $100 in aggregate per year, with exceptions for family gifts, honorary degrees, professional organization benefits, and reimbursed seminar expenses. Violations are enforceable by the Attorney General through civil penalties or criminal prosecution for knowing violations.
Why we flagged it
The bill's core function is to codify and enforce gift restrictions on federal judges, closing gaps in existing ethics rules and creating a clear enforcement mechanism through the Attorney General.
What the text implies
- The bill creates a new enforcement pathway through the Attorney General, potentially politicizing ethics complaints if the AG's office becomes selective in prosecution.
- The $50/$100 thresholds are fixed in statute rather than indexed to inflation, meaning their real value will erode over time unless Congress amends the law.
The full analysis lists 4 implications of this text.
Who it affects
The bill strengthens judicial ethics and public trust by restricting judges' ability to accept gifts from parties with interests before them, reducing appearance of impropriety and potential conflicts of interest. The exceptions are narrow and well-defined, preserving legitimate professional development and family relationships without creating loopholes.