Congress blocks Trump from using taxpayer funds to settle Trump v. IRS
H.R. 8914 — No Taxpayer-Funded Settlement Slush Funds Act of 2026 · Filed by Jamie Raskin (D-MD) · 110 cosponsors · Introduced May 20, 2026 · Referred to committee
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill blocks federal funds from paying settlements or awards to the President, Vice President, their family members, presidentially-owned entities, cabinet members, senior Executive Office staff, and political appointees. It also bars settlements related to January 6, foreign election interference, or cases already dismissed with prejudice. Settlements over $100,000 must be reported to Congress within 30 days; those over $250,000 face a 120-day congressional review period. The bill specifically targets a May 18, 2026 settlement in Trump v. IRS and amends federal settlement law to prevent executive self-dealing.
Why we flagged it
The bill's core function is to prevent sitting executives and their entities from using federal settlement funds to pay claims against themselves. While framed as a general anti-slush-fund measure, it is explicitly designed to block a specific pending settlement involving the sitting President.
What the text implies
- The 120-day congressional review period creates a de facto veto mechanism: Congress can block settlements by refusing to appropriate funds, shifting settlement authority from the Executive to the Legislative branch for high-value claims.
- The definition of 'presidentially-owned entity' carves out large public companies and diversified funds, but captures closely-held businesses and family entities—potentially affecting settlement disputes involving Trump Organization or similar structures.
- Retroactive application to settlements 'made on or after January 20, 2025' may expose already-executed settlements to clawback litigation if they involved prohibited parties, creating legal uncertainty.
- The bill does not restrict the President from settling claims in his personal capacity through private funds or non-federal sources, only federal fund disbursement—a narrower constraint than the title suggests.
Who it affects
The bill restricts government officials and their entities from using taxpayer funds to settle claims against themselves—a core accountability measure that prevents self-dealing and protects public money. Ordinary citizens benefit from transparency (mandatory reporting) and a cooling-off period that allows Congress to scrutinize large settlements before they are paid.
Named in the bill
Trump, et al. v. IRS, et al., U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida, Civil Action No. 1:26-cv-20609–KMW, House Committee on the Judiciary, Senate Committee on the Judiciary, Secretary of the Treasury, Attorney General, Executive Office of the President, Securities and Exchange Commission, Investment Company Act of 1940
Where it stands
110 cosponsors: 110 Democrats.
- May 20, 2026 — Introduced · Congress.gov: “Introduced in House”
- May 20, 2026 — Referred to House Committee on the Judiciary · Congress.gov: “Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary”
Dates and quoted wording are Congress.gov's action record; the timeline shows status changes, not every procedural step.
How this was measured
Analysis — Quorum's AI read the full bill text on Jul 5, 2026; transparency and hidden-provision scores are compared against the median of 16,222 analysed bills.
Status and sponsors — Congress.gov's bill record — actions, committee referrals and cosponsors — loaded nightly. The timeline shows status changes, not every procedural action.
As of — page rendered 2026-10-20.
“Congress blocks Trump from using taxpayer funds to settle Trump v. IRS” QuorumCivic. https://share.quorumcivic.app/bill/119/hr8914 Report an error
The week in bills
One email, Sunday: what Congress passed, what it changed, and who paid.
One link arrives to confirm the address. It is used for this email and nothing else, and every issue carries an unsubscribe link.