AI chatbots must get your permission to train on your conversations
H.R. 9619 — People-First Chatbot Act · Filed by Valerie Foushee (D-NC) · 1 cosponsor · Introduced Jul 9, 2026 · Referred to committee
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill requires AI chatbot providers to obtain explicit user consent before using chat data for training or advertising, prohibits selling chat logs, mandates monthly safety assessments for minors, requires clear disclosure that users are talking to AI (not humans), and gives users rights to access and delete their data. It creates federal enforcement through the FTC and private lawsuits, with statutory damages up to $250,000 for violations causing serious harm.
Why we flagged it
The bill's core mechanism is a comprehensive privacy and safety regime for AI chatbots, restricting data use, requiring consent, mandating transparency, and creating enforcement. It is functionally a consumer protection statute, not a deregulation or subsidy.
What the text implies
- Statutory damages of $250,000 per violation for harm-causing violations may create significant litigation risk for chatbot providers, potentially chilling innovation or leading to defensive business model changes (e.g., refusing US users).
- The definition of 'covered harm' (death, suicide attempt, psychiatric emergency) creates liability even when a provider exercised reasonable care, shifting injury risk entirely to the provider regardless of causation clarity.
The full analysis lists 5 implications of this text.
Who stands to gain
plaintiff's attorneys (private right of action with attorney's fees); consumer advocacy organizations (enforcement standing); compliance and privacy consulting firms