Congress restores investor right to sue, bans forced arbitration clauses
H.R. 9462 — Investor Choice Act of 2026 · Filed by Bill Foster (D-IL) · 1 cosponsor · Introduced Jun 25, 2026 · Referred to committee
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill prohibits brokers, dealers, investment advisers, and public companies from forcing investors into mandatory arbitration or class-action waivers. It allows investors to choose whether to arbitrate disputes or sue in court, and bars companies from listing securities or registering with the SEC if they mandate arbitration in shareholder agreements. The bill voids existing mandatory arbitration clauses while preserving arbitrations already underway.
Why we flagged it
The bill's core mechanism is restoring investor choice and court access by prohibiting mandatory arbitration and class-action waivers in securities agreements. It is fundamentally a consumer-protection measure that shifts power from financial firms back to individual investors.
What the text implies
- Brokers and advisers may respond by raising fees or tightening account minimums to offset increased litigation risk, potentially reducing access for smaller retail investors.
- Class-action litigation against securities firms may increase substantially, creating longer dispute resolution timelines for some investors despite nominally expanding choice.
The full analysis lists 4 implications of this text.
Who stands to gain
plaintiff-side securities litigation firms; class-action attorneys; retail investors (as a class)